Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

6.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
6.7K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

7.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
7.2K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

5.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
5.0K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Behrens–Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

143
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
143

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Bayesian evaluation for latent variable models: A tutorial on computing information criteria and bayes factors with the r package bleval.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A stochastic block prior for clustering in graphical models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Three-level vector autoregressive models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Scaling cognitive modeling to big data: A deep learning approach to studying individual differences in evidence accumulation model parameters.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

Best practices in multilevel modeling for within-cluster group comparisons: An evaluation of coding strategies reflecting group composition and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2026
Same journal

A unified framework for psychometrics in experimental psychology: The standardized generalized hierarchical factor model.

Psychological methods·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.5K

Improved confidence intervals for differences between standardized effect sizes.

Kevin D Bird1

  • 1School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney.

Psychological Methods
|April 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing effect sizes requires standard scores. This study reveals that standard confidence intervals (CIs) for differential effects can be too narrow, especially with high correlations. An adjusted score method improves CI accuracy.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

73.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

73.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Methods
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Evaluating differences between effect sizes often relies on standard scores when raw data lack comparable units.
  • Sample-based standardization is common, but its impact on differential effect confidence intervals (CIs) is under-examined.
  • Existing methods may produce inaccurate CIs, particularly in within-subjects designs with high dependent variable correlation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the accuracy of differential effect confidence intervals (CIs) derived from sample-based standardization.
  • To propose and evaluate a novel method for constructing more accurate differential effect CIs.
  • To improve the reliability of statistical inference for comparing effect sizes across dependent variables.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the consequences of sample-based standardization for differential effect CIs.
  • A new approach using adjusted sample-based standard scores is proposed for CI construction.
  • Computer simulations are employed to compare coverage probabilities of new and existing CI methods.

Main Results:

  • Differential effect CIs based on unadjusted standard scores can be excessively narrow, especially for large effects and highly correlated variables.
  • The proposed method using adjusted standard scores allows for conventional CI procedures to yield improved results.
  • Simulations demonstrate that adjusted standard score CIs offer substantially better coverage probabilities than unadjusted ones.

Conclusions:

  • Standard sample-based standardization can lead to inaccurate confidence intervals for differential effect sizes.
  • The adjusted standard score approach provides a more reliable method for constructing differential effect CIs.
  • This improved method enhances the precision of statistical comparisons between effect sizes in psychological research.