Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Routine Laboratory Tests are not Necessary After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study Utilizing a
Jessica L H Phillips1, Yale A Fillingham1, William F Mitchell2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
This study tested whether stopping routine blood tests after joint replacement surgery is safe. Researchers compared patients who had selective testing with those who had standard tests. They found no difference in complications within 90 days. The selective group had more fluid given during hospitalization but no increase in problems. The findings suggest that routine tests may not be needed for most patients. This could help reduce unnecessary procedures in orthopedic care.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery outcomes research
- Clinical laboratory medicine within surgical care
- Postoperative care protocols in joint replacement
Background:
Standard practice in orthopedic surgery includes routine postoperative laboratory tests following total joint arthroplasty. However, no strong evidence supports this approach. Prior research has shown that many of these tests do not influence clinical decisions. That uncertainty drove this study to examine if selective testing could replace routine testing. No prior work had resolved whether eliminating these tests would affect complication rates. This gap motivated the development of an algorithmic approach. The study aimed to assess safety and effectiveness of this change. The focus was on primary unilateral TJA patients. The goal was to determine if selective testing could reduce unnecessary procedures.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to evaluate whether discontinuing routine postoperative laboratory tests after primary unilateral TJA is safe and effective. Researchers sought to determine if this change impacts 90-day complication rates. The protocol change was tested at a high-volume surgical center. The control group received standard testing, while the protocol group used a selective algorithm. The study focused on patients without preexisting conditions that might require frequent monitoring. The primary outcome was 90-day complication rates. The goal was to ensure patient safety while reducing unnecessary interventions. The findings could inform future clinical guidelines.
Main Methods:
The study was a prospective protocol change at a high-volume TJA center. Patients were divided into control and protocol groups. The control group received standard postoperative laboratory tests. The protocol group used a selective algorithm based on preoperative risk factors. Exclusions included patients with bleeding disorders, COPD, arrhythmia, heart disease, heart failure, chronic renal failure, dementia, or abnormal preoperative labs. Data collection included in-hospital and 90-day outcomes. Statistical methods included t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. A pre-hoc power analysis determined a sample size of 607 per group.
Main Results:
The protocol group included 937 patients and the control group included 891 patients. The protocol group had fewer females and fewer total hip arthroplasties. No differences were found in age, BMI, or estimated blood loss. Transfusion rates were similar between groups. Electrolyte corrections and unplanned consults were also unchanged. The protocol group had more fluid boluses and home discharges. Length of stay and transfers did not differ. 90-day complication rates were identical between groups.
Conclusions:
The study found no difference in 90-day complications between the protocol and control groups. The authors propose that discontinuing routine postoperative laboratory tests is safe and effective. The selective algorithm reduced unnecessary testing without increasing risk. The findings suggest this approach could be applied to most primary unilateral TJA patients. The researchers suggest this protocol may improve resource use in orthopedic surgery. The results support a shift from routine to selective testing. The study does not claim this applies to all TJA patients. The authors recommend further validation in other settings.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study found no difference in 90-day complication rates between patients who had selective testing and those who had routine testing.
Patients with bleeding disorders, COPD, arrhythmia, heart disease, heart failure, chronic renal failure, dementia, or abnormal preoperative labs were excluded.
The protocol group had more fluid boluses, possibly due to fewer routine tests leading to more proactive hydration strategies.
The study used t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables to compare groups.
The protocol group had 937 patients and the control group had 891 patients.
The authors propose that selective laboratory testing is safe and effective for most primary unilateral TJA patients.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018