Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

A Semi-automated Approach to Preparing Antibody Cocktails for Immunophenotypic Analysis of Human Peripheral Blood
Published on: February 8, 2016
New Analytical Approach for the Alignment of Different HE4 Automated Immunometric Systems: An Italian Multicentric
Antonio Angeloni1, Corrado De Vito2, Antonella Farina1
1Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy.
This study harmonizes Human Epididymal Secretory Protein 4 (HE4) values across different labs, improving accuracy for gynecological cancer detection. The new approach enhances diagnostic reliability for ovarian cancer and other malignant neoplasms.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Human Epididymal Secretory Protein 4 (HE4) is a key biomarker for gynecological cancers like ovarian cancer (OC).
- Conflicting reports exist regarding the optimal HE4 cutoff values for accurate diagnosis.
- Variability in HE4 measurements across different laboratory platforms poses a challenge for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an analytical approach for harmonizing HE4 values obtained from diverse laboratory resources.
- To establish a standardized method for HE4 measurement, reducing inter-laboratory bias.
- To improve the accuracy and reliability of HE4 as a biomarker for gynecological cancer detection.
Main Methods:
- Six Italian laboratories collaborated, utilizing distinct analytical platforms (Abbott Alinity I, Fujirebio Lumipulse G1200/G600, Roche Cobas 601, Abbott Architett).
- A common reference calibration curve was established and tested across all participating labs.
- Bias correction was applied before analyzing a common database of 1509 patients' biomarker values.
Main Results:
- The initial evaluation revealed analytical bias among different HE4 detection devices.
- Post-bias correction, HE4 demonstrated significantly better accuracy than CA125 in post-menopausal women for distinguishing malignant from non-malignant gynecological diseases (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.74, p=0.001 for age ≤60; AUC 0.78 vs. 0.72, p=0.024 for age >60).
- HE4 also showed higher accuracy than CA125 in pre-menopausal women over 40 (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.66, p=0.027), suggesting potential for fertile patients.
Conclusions:
- The developed analytical model successfully harmonizes HE4 values across different diagnostic tools.
- This approach enhances the accuracy of HE4 for diagnosing gynecological cancers, particularly ovarian cancer.
- The findings support a new strategy for identifying optimal HE4 cut-offs, improving clinical management of malignant neoplasms.
More Related Videos
05:25Author Spotlight: Expanding the Scope of Multiplex Immunoassays for Lyme Borreliosis Diagnostics and Pathogen Research
Published on: July 14, 2023
06:50A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020