Gingival pedicle with split-thickness tunnel technique: A retrospective case series for single mandibular anterior...

Gingival recessions in the mandibular anterior sextant are a common clinical finding, but mucogingival treatment in this location is particularly challenging, due to several anatomical and surgical difficulties. In the present case series, a novel technique, called gingival pedicle with split-thickness tunnel (GPST), was retrospectively evaluated.

Fifteen patients presenting with a single buccal RT1 or RT2 gingival recession of a depth of ≥3 mm in the mandibular anterior sextant were treated by means of the GPST technique. Clinical periodontal parameters at baseline and at the last follow-up evaluation visit (6-84 months) were compared. Early healing was uneventful in all cases, and no complications such as flap dehiscence or loss of connective tissue graft were observed. Mean root coverage (mRC) was 98.1% ± 7.38%, corresponding to a statistically significant recession reduction (ΔRD) of 4.53 ± 1.19 mm. Complete root coverage was achieved in 14 of 15 cases. The gain in keratinized tissue width amounted to 3.13 ± 0.99 mm and was statistically significant, whereas no significant change in periodontal probing depth was observed after treatment.

In conclusion, treatment with GPST technique seems to achieve a favorable and predictable clinical improvement in gingival recessions on mandibular anterior teeth. Why are these cases new information? Limited information is available about the management of isolated deep labial recessions in the mandibular anterior teeth. A novel surgical approach, called GPST technique, is described in a case series to specifically address this type of defect. What are the keys to successful management of these cases? Horizontal incision ≥ REC_width Cut-back preparation helps to mobilize the flap without tension. CTG width ≥ 3 times REC_width CTG height ≥ REC_depth Proper graft and flap stabilization need to be achieved. What are the primary limitations to success in these cases? Limited mesio-distal dimensions, which do not allow to obtain a pedicle with adequate horizontal width Very thin biotype may not be suitable because of the risk of inadequate flap vascularization.