Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Reduced Procedure Time and Variability with Active Esophageal Cooling During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: August 25, 2022
Procedural time reduction associated with active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation.
Christopher Joseph1, Jacob Sherman2, Alex Ro3
1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. christopher.joseph@utsouthwestern.edu.
Active esophageal cooling significantly reduces pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure times compared to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring. This method improves efficiency by avoiding pauses caused by heat stacking and overheating alarms during atrial fibrillation treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Active esophageal cooling is an alternative to luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring for preventing thermal injury during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF).
- While active cooling's efficacy in reducing thermal injury is established, its impact on procedural efficiency requires further characterization.
- LET monitoring can cause procedure delays due to heat stacking and overheating alarms, unlike active esophageal cooling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the change in PVI procedure duration after implementing active esophageal cooling.
- To compare procedural efficiency between active esophageal cooling and LET monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients undergoing PVI between January 2018 and February 2020.
- Comparison of total procedure times between patients who underwent LET monitoring and those who used active esophageal cooling.
- Analysis included patient demographics (age, gender) and procedure duration.
Main Results:
- Mean procedure time was significantly reduced by 36 minutes (24.7%) with active esophageal cooling (110 min) compared to LET monitoring (146 min) (p < .001).
- Median procedure time decreased by 41 minutes (29.1%) with active cooling (100 min) versus LET monitoring (141 min) (p < .001).
- No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Active esophageal cooling is associated with a substantial reduction in procedure duration during PVI.
- This finding suggests improved procedural efficiency when using active esophageal cooling over LET monitoring for esophageal protection.
More Related Videos
05:43Author Spotlight: Improving Lesion Contiguity in Pulmonary Vein Isolation via Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
06:25Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020