Margetuximab Versus Trastuzumab in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

In the international, randomized, open-label, phase III study SOPHIA trial, margetuximab plus chemotherapy showed improved progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether margetuximab plus chemotherapy is cost-effective compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in pretreated patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer.

The clinical data for this model was derived from the SOPHIA trial. Costs and utility were either derived from the standard fee database or extracted from previously published literature. A three-state Markov model was developed to simulate the disease process of patients with advanced breast cancer. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of variables in the analysis model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed based on 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations. A subgroup analysis was performed to test whether margetuximab is cost-effective in CD16A-158F allele carriers.

Margetuximab plus chemotherapy provided an incremental 0.04 QALYs with an incremental cost of $66,109.78, compared with the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,486,442.35/QALY, which exceeded the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold. While in the CD16A-158F allele carriers subgroup, the ICER decreased to $592,669.73/QALY. The variance of the utility of PFS state, costs of margetuximab, and utility of progressive disease state were the most influential factors in the sensitivity analysis.

Under current WTP threshold, margetuximab plus chemotherapy is not cost-effective compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in pretreated patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer. Selecting CD16A-158F allele carriers might be a considerable option to optimize the cost-effectiveness of margetuximab.