Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Aortic valve intervention for aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Diana de Campos1, Carolina Saleiro1, Ana Botelho1
1Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra - Hospital Geral, Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho do Bispo 108, Coimbra, 3041-801, Portugal.
Insights
Cardiac amyloidosis with aortic stenosis (CA-AS) is prevalent in older adults. Aortic valve intervention in CA-AS patients shows comparable mortality risks to aortic stenosis alone, suggesting it is not futile.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Cardiac Amyloidosis Research
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular heart disease, particularly in the elderly.
- Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is increasingly recognized as a comorbidity with AS, termed CA-AS.
- Outcomes for CA-AS patients undergoing aortic valve (AV) intervention require further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of outcomes following AV intervention in patients with CA-AS.
- To conduct a meta-analysis to assess the risk of all-cause mortality after AV intervention in CA-AS.
- To compare outcomes of AV intervention in CA-AS versus AS alone.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
- Inclusion of studies reporting outcomes after surgical or transcatheter AV replacement in CA-AS patients.
- Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- Weighted pooled analysis indicated a non-significant trend towards higher mortality risk in CA-AS patients post-AV replacement (surgical or transcatheter).
- Specifically, after transcatheter AV replacement, the risk of death in CA-AS patients was comparable to patients with AS alone (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.77-1.96).
- Low heterogeneity (I² = 0%) was observed in the transcatheter AV replacement group.
Conclusions:
- Aortic valve intervention may not be futile in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and aortic stenosis.
- These findings suggest that patients with CA-AS should not be denied AV intervention.
- Further research may refine risk stratification and management strategies for this complex patient group.
Abstract:
Aortic stenosis with cardiac amyloidosis (CA-AS) is common in the elderly. We provide an overview and a meta-analysis of outcomes after aortic valve (AV) intervention. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Weighted pooled analysis showed a non-significant higher risk of death in CA-AS patients following surgical or transcatheter AV replacement. After transcatheter AV replacement, the risk of death in CA-AS patients was comparable to that associated with aortic stenosis alone (risk ratio: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.77-1.96; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%). An AV intervention is possibly not futile in CA-AS and should not be denied to patients with this condition.
More Related Videos
04:30Investigating Aortic Valve Calcification via Isolation and Culture of T Lymphocytes using Feeder Cells from Irradiated Buffy Coat
Published on: February 4, 2021
14:14Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management