Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Automated Midline Shift and Intracranial Pressure Estimation based on Brain CT Images
Published on: April 13, 2013
Segmentation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage on CT With a Region Growing Method Based on Watershed
Zhengsong Zhou1, Hongli Wan2, Haoyu Zhang1
1Department of Electronic Information Engineering, Chengdu Jincheng College, Chengdu, China.
Insights
A novel region-growing algorithm with watershed preprocessing (RG-WP) accurately segments and quantifies intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) on CT scans. This automated method shows high agreement with manual segmentation and comparable accuracy to deep learning, improving ICH diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Computational Pathology
Background:
- Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening condition with high incidence and poor prognosis.
- Accurate identification of bleeding location and volume from CT images is crucial for ICH diagnosis and treatment.
- Existing methods like ABC/2 have limitations in precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a novel region-growing algorithm based on watershed preprocessing (RG-WP) for segmenting and quantifying ICH.
- To compare the performance of the RG-WP algorithm against manual segmentation, the ABC/2 method, and the U-net deep learning algorithm.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a region-growing algorithm utilizing watershed preprocessing for seed point identification.
- Employed manual seed point selection on watershed segmentation to incorporate clinical expertise.
- Evaluated the RG-WP algorithm on CT images from 55 ICH patients, comparing results with manual delineations and other methods.
Main Results:
- The RG-WP algorithm demonstrated a mean deviation of -0.12 ml from manual segmentation, significantly outperforming the ABC/2 method (1.05 ml).
- Achieved high agreement with manual segmentation (ICC: 0.998), superior to ABC/2 (ICC: 0.972).
- RG-WP showed high consistency metrics (Sensitivity: 0.92, PPV: 0.95, DSI: 0.93, JI: 0.88) comparable to U-net.
Conclusions:
- The RG-WP algorithm provides accurate and reliable segmentation and quantification of intracerebral hemorrhage.
- It offers a valuable tool for assisting clinicians in ICH diagnosis and treatment planning.
- The method demonstrates robust performance, comparable to advanced deep learning techniques.
Abstract:
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a great threat to human life due to its high incidence and poor prognosis. Identification of the bleeding location and quantification of the volume based on CT images are of great significance for assisting the diagnosis and treatment of ICH. In this study, a region-growing algorithm based on watershed preprocessing (RG-WP) was proposed to segment and quantify the hemorrhage. The lowest points yielded by the watershed algorithm were used as seed points for region growing and then hemorrhage was segmented based on the region growing method. At the same time, to integrate the rich experience of clinicians with the algorithm, manual selection of seed points on the basis of watershed segmentation was performed. With the application of segmentation on CT images of 55 patients with ICH, the performance of the RG-WP algorithm was evaluated by comparing it with manual segmentations delineated by professional clinicians as well as the traditional ABC/2 method and the deep learning algorithm U-net. The mean deviation of hemorrhage volume of the RG-WP algorithm from manual segmentation was -0.12 ml (range: -1.05-1.16), while that of the ABC/2 from the manual was 1.05 ml (range: -0.77-9.57). Strong agreement of the algorithm and the manual was confirmed with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999), which was superior to that of the ABC/2 and the manual (0.972, 95% CI: 0.953-0.984). The sensitivity (Sen), positive predictive value (PPV), dice similarity index (DSI), and Jaccard index (JI) of the RG-WP algorithm compared to the manual were 0.92 ± 0.04, 0.95 ± 0.04, 0.93 ± 0.02, and 0.88 ± 0.04, respectively, showing high consistency. Besides, the accuracy of the algorithm was also comparable to that of the deep learning method U-net, with Sen, PPV, DSI, and JI being 0.91 ± 0.09, 0.91 ± 0.06, 0.91 ± 0.05, and 0.91 ± 0.06, respectively.
More Related Videos
10:25Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
12:50Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly
Published on: April 14, 2014