Computational identification of potential chemoprophylactic agents according to dynamic behavior of peroxisome

Zhiwei Yang1,2,3, Yizhen Zhao1, Dongxiao Hao1

  • 1MOE Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, School of Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 China yzws-123@xjtu.edu.cn zhangsl@xjtu.edu.cn +86-29-82660915 +86-29-82660915.

RSC Advances
|April 15, 2022
PubMed

Insights

This study identifies potential lung cancer chemoprevention drugs by screening for Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists. Novel compounds like gusperimus and miltefosine show promise by targeting PPARγ

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and drug discovery
  • Molecular modeling and simulation
  • Pharmacology and chemoprevention

Background:

  • Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a key target for lung cancer chemoprevention.
  • Drug development for PPARγ has been hindered by challenges in receptor modeling due to its dynamic nature.
  • Understanding PPARγ's conformational flexibility is crucial for effective structure-based drug design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply an integrated virtual screening strategy to identify PPARγ agonists for lung cancer chemoprevention.
  • To investigate the impact of ligand binding on PPARγ's conformational dynamics, particularly key loops and surfaces.
  • To discover novel chemoprophylactic agents targeting PPARγ.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a receptor-based virtual screening (VS) approach integrating extensive docking and conformational sampling.
  • Analyzed the conformational plasticity of PPARγ, focusing on the H2 & S245 loop, H2' & Ω loop, and AF-2 surface.
  • Screened commercial agents for their ability to modulate PPARγ dynamics and AF-2 surface flexibility.

Main Results:

  • The conformational plasticity of PPARγ is significantly influenced by the binding of full and partial agonists.
  • Identified five commercial agents with antineoplastic properties, including ZINC03775146 (gusperimus) and ZINC14087743 (miltefosine) as potential novel PPARγ agonists.
  • These compounds exhibit flexible switching of the AF-2 surface and state changes in the Ω loop, indicating potential chemoprophylactic activity.

Conclusions:

  • The integrated VS strategy effectively accounts for PPARγ's dynamic behavior, aiding drug discovery for flexible targets.
  • Gusperimus and miltefosine show promise as PPARγ agonists for lung cancer chemoprevention.
  • The identified dynamic structural couplings offer new avenues for developing PPARγ-targeted therapeutics.

Related Concept Videos

Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors01:31

Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors

Nuclear receptors, or NRs, are unique transcription factors that regulate gene transcription and affect the cellular pathways involved in reproduction, development, or metabolism. Their ability to be stimulated by small lipophilic ligands and control vital cellular processes makes them ideal drug targets. Nearly 10-15% of currently prescribed drugs target these receptors.
About 48 different soluble family members of nuclear receptors are identified that can be divided into two main classes:
1.7K
Peroxisomes01:24

Peroxisomes

Peroxisomes are specialized organelles present in fungi, plant, and animal cells. It can vary in number, size, morphology, and activity depending on the type of tissue and the nutritional state of the cell. For example, cells with active lipid metabolism, such as adipocytes, neurons, and hepatocytes, have more peroxisomes than other cells in the body. Besides their primary role in breaking down complex organic molecules, peroxisomes can also synthesize specific macromolecules and participate in...
14.6K
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.5K