Indications for and Risks Associated With Implant Removal After Pediatric Trauma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Blake K Montgomery1, James G Gamble, Stephanie T Kha
1From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA (Dr. Lucas and Dr. Hecht); Stanford Orthopaedics, San Jose, CA (Dr. Lucas and Dr. Hecht); and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA (Dr. Montgomery, Dr. Gamble, Dr. Kha, and Dr. Vorhies).
Insights
Pediatric fracture implants require careful consideration due to unique bone properties. Implant removal decisions balance risks like refracture against benefits, with timing varying based on patient and fracture factors.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Pediatric trauma care
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Pediatric fractures necessitate diverse implants (wires, plates, screws, rods, external fixators).
- Pediatric bone mechanics and biology, including remodeling potential, differ significantly from adult bone.
- Implants in pediatric trauma patients involve unique considerations for use, risks, removal timing, weight-bearing, and long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the unique aspects of orthopedic implant use in pediatric fracture treatment.
- To discuss indications, risks, and timing of implant removal in pediatric patients.
- To highlight the importance of assessing risks versus benefits for implant removal.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of pediatric fracture treatment and implant management.
- Analysis of factors influencing implant removal decisions in pediatric trauma.
- Discussion of complications and sequelae associated with pediatric orthopedic implants.
Main Results:
- Implant removal indications include wire/pin fixation, significant remaining growth, and infection.
- The primary risk associated with implant removal is refracture.
- Timing for implant removal is highly variable (weeks to over a year) and depends on fracture type, implant, and skeletal maturity.
Conclusions:
- Implant removal in pediatric fractures requires individualized assessment of risks and benefits.
- Skeletal maturity and fracture characteristics significantly influence the decision for implant retention or removal.
- Careful management of orthopedic implants is crucial for optimal outcomes in pediatric trauma patients.
Abstract:
A wide range of implants are used in the treatment of pediatric fractures, including wires, plates, screws, flexible rods, rigid rods, and external fixation devices. Pediatric bones differ from adult bones both mechanically and biologically, including the potential for remodeling. Implants used in pediatric trauma patients present a unique set of circumstances regarding indications, risks, timing of implant removal, weight-bearing restrictions, and long-term sequelae. Indications for implant removal include wire/pin fixation, when substantial growth remains, and infection. When considering implant removal, the risks and benefits must be assessed. The primary risk of implant removal is refracture. The timing of implant removal varies widely from several weeks to a year or more with the option of retention depending on the fracture, type of implant, and skeletal maturity of the patient.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021