Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

HPLC-based Assay to Monitor Extracellular Nucleotide/Nucleoside Metabolism in Human Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells
Published on: July 20, 2016
Landscape of NOTCH1 mutations and co-occurring biomarker alterations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Fatima Zahra Jelloul1, Richard Yang1, Sofia Garces1
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.
Abstract:
NOTCH1 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and has emerged as a marker of poor prognosis. In addition to coding NOTCH1 mutations involving exon 34, non-coding NOTCH1 mutations involving the 3' UTR have been described in a limited number of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and were associated with adverse outcomes. In this study, 1574 CLL patients were assessed using targeted sequencing with a 29 gene panel and the results were correlated with prognostic characteristics. NOTCH1 mutations were detected in 252 (16%) patients, including both coding (220/252, 14%), non-coding (24/252, 1.5%) and a mixture of coding and non-coding (8/252, 0.5%) NOTCH1 mutations. NOTCH1 mutations were more commonly seen in patients with unmutated IGHV, ZAP70 positivity and CD38 positivity. Mixed NOTCH1 mutations were also more commonly seen in patients with unmutated IGHV and ZAP70. There was no association between mixed NOTCH1 mutations and CD38 expression in this cohort. The most common cytogenetic alteration detected in patients with coding and mixed NOTCH1 mutations was trisomy 12, whereas del13q was the most common cytogenetic alteration detected in patients with non-coding NOTCH1 mutation. The most common gene mutations co-occurring with coding NOTCH1 mutations were: TP53 (23.2%), SF3B1 (16.4%) and SPEN (10%). The most common gene mutations co-occurring with non-coding NOTCH1 mutations were: SF3B1 11(34.4%), ATM 4(12.5%) and TP53 4(12.5%). CLL patients with clonal coding and non-coding NOTCH1 mutations had a significantly shorter time-to-first treatment than patients with wild type NOTCH1 (4.3 vs 10.0 years and 0.9 vs 10.0 years respectively, p < 0.05). Similarly, CLL patients with subclonal coding NOTCH1 mutations had a significantly shorter time-to-first treatment than patients with wild type NOTCH1 (5.6 vs 10.0 years, p < 0.05). CLL patients with subclonal non-coding NOTCH1 mutations also had a shorter time-to-first treatment than patients with wild type NOTCH1 mutations, however, the difference was not significant (5.1 vs 10.0 years, p = 0.15). These data confirm that both coding and non-coding NOTCH1 mutations carry adverse prognostic impact and need to be included in sequencing assays performed for the prognostic workup of CLL patients.
More Related Videos
09:08Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
09:52A Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay to Identify Novel NFAT2 Target Genes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published on: December 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Notch Signaling Pathway
The Notch gene came into the limelight in 1914 after the discovery that its mutation in Drosophila melanogaster leads to a serrated (or "notched") wing margin phenotype. It was not...
Role Of Notch Signalling In Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal
Direct cell-to-cell contact is needed for the activation of Notch signaling. The signal is initiated when a notch ligand binds to a receptor on an adjacent cell, also...
The Nucleolus