Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
Challenging T > MIC Using Meropenem vs. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
A Nussbaumer-Pröll1, S Eberl1, E Kurdina1
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
Objective: For meropenem 40%T > MIC is associated with optimal killing of P. aeruginosa and E. coli. However, it is unknown how the distribution of %T > MIC through a treatment day impacts the antimicrobial effect in vitro. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro antibiotic activity of meropenem, precisely if 40%T > MIC is achieved in one single long period (single dose), 2 × 20% periods (dosing-bid), or 3 × 13.3% (dosing t.i.d.) thereby keeping the overall period of T > MIC constant. Material/Methods: Time kill curves (TKC) with P. aeruginosa-ATCC-27853 and E. coli-ATCC-25922 and five clinical isolates each were implemented over 24 h in CAMHB with concentrations from 0.25×MIC-32×MIC. Periods over and under MIC were simulated by centrifugation steps (discarding supernatant and refilling with fresh CAMHB). Double and triple dosing involved further addition and removal of antibiotic. Complementary growth controls (GC) with and without centrifugation steps were done and the emergence of phenotypical resistance was evaluated (repeated MIC-testing after antibiotic administration). Results: No impact of centrifugation on bacterial growth was seen. TKC with P. aeruginosa showed the best killing in the triple dosage, followed by the double and single dose. In multiple regimens at least a concentration of 4×MIC was needed to achieve a recommended 2-3 log10 killing. Likewise, a reduction of E. coli was best within the three short periods. Contrary to the TKCs with P. aeruginosa we could observe that after the inoculum reached a certain CFU/mL (≥10^8), no further addition of antibiotic could achieve bacterial killing (identified as the inoculum effect). For P. aeruginosa isolates resistance appeared within all regimens, the most pronounced was found in the 40%T > MIC experiments indicating that a single long period might accelerate the emergence of resistance. Contrary, for E. coli no emergence of resistance was found. Conclusion/Outlook: We could show that not solely the %T > MIC is decisive for an efficient bacterial eradication in vitro, but also the distribution of the selected %T > MIC. Thus, dividing the 40%T > MIC in three short periods requested lowers antibiotic concentrations to achieve efficient bacterial killing and reduces the emergence of resistance in P. aeruginosa isolates. The distribution of the %T > MIC did impact the bacterial eradication of susceptible pathogens in vitro and might play an even bigger role in infections with intermediate or resistant pathogens.
Insights
Dividing meropenem exposure time (40%T > MIC) into three doses enhanced bacterial killing and reduced resistance emergence in P. aeruginosa in vitro. This dosing strategy proved more effective than single or double doses for optimal antimicrobial activity.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Meropenem's efficacy against P. aeruginosa and E. coli is linked to 40%T > MIC.
- The impact of %T > MIC distribution on antimicrobial effect in vitro remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the in vitro antibiotic activity of meropenem based on %T > MIC distribution.
- To compare the efficacy of single, double, and triple dosing regimens of meropenem in achieving 40%T > MIC.
Main Methods:
- Time kill curves (TKC) were performed with P. aeruginosa and E. coli isolates.
- Simulated different dosing regimens (single, double, triple) to maintain a constant 40%T > MIC.
- Evaluated bacterial killing, inoculum effect, and emergence of phenotypical resistance.
Main Results:
- Triple dosing of meropenem showed the best bacterial killing for P. aeruginosa and E. coli.
- A minimum concentration of 4×MIC was required for significant bacterial reduction in multiple regimens.
- Resistance emerged in P. aeruginosa across all regimens, most pronounced with single dosing; no resistance emerged in E. coli.
Conclusions:
- The distribution of %T > MIC, not just the duration, is crucial for efficient bacterial eradication in vitro.
- Dividing 40%T > MIC into three doses enhances killing and reduces resistance emergence in P. aeruginosa.
- Dosing strategy may significantly impact outcomes with intermediate or resistant pathogens.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

