Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

274
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
274
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

303
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
303
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

6.5K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
6.5K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

619
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
619
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

265
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
265
Hearing01:31

Hearing

53.2K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
53.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing the mucosal frontier: longevity and epithelial barriers in prime-boost mRNA vaccine strategies.

Journal of translational medicine·2026
Same author

Development of a Machine Learning‑Based Prognostic Model for Intermediate Trophoblastic Tumors: A Single-Center Study With Web-Based Tool Implementation.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Color vision.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same author

Temporal dynamics of adaptation to same- and other-race faces: buildup, decay and sustained effects.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

HIF-1α impairs NK cell differentiation-maturation and cytotoxicity in myelodysplastic syndrome via JAK1/STAT5/SOCS2 pathway.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

Asymmetries in hue percepts and early cortical color coding: Evidence from chromatic visual evoked potentials.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Controllable Medical Image Generation via GAN.

Journal of perceptual imaging·2023
Same journal

Neurocomputational Lightness Model Explains the Appearance of Real Surfaces Viewed Under Gelb Illumination.

Journal of perceptual imaging·2023
Same journal

Perception and Appreciation of Tactile Objects: The Role of Visual Experience and Texture Parameters.

Journal of perceptual imaging·2023
Same journal

Introducing CatchU<sup>â„¢</sup>: A Novel Multisensory Tool for Assessing Patients' Risk of Falling.

Journal of perceptual imaging·2023
Same journal

Crossmodal Postdiction: Conscious Perception as Revisionist History.

Journal of perceptual imaging·2022
Same journal

Cartography as Spatial Representation: A new assessment of the competing advantages and drawbacks across fields of science.

Journal of perceptual imaging·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.3K

ENHANCED PERIPHERAL FACE PROCESSING IN DEAF INDIVIDUALS.

Kassandra R Lee1, Elizabeth Groesbeck2, O Scott Gwinn3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno.

Journal of Perceptual Imaging
|April 18, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deaf individuals show enhanced face discrimination abilities, not just centrally but also in the peripheral visual field. This suggests cross-modal plasticity benefits visual processing beyond expected limits.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.9K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.3K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.9K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory and Visual Sensory Systems

Background:

  • Compensatory visual function changes occur following auditory loss.
  • Deaf individuals exhibit enhanced central visual field face processing, potentially due to American Sign Language (ASL) experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if enhanced face discrimination in deaf individuals extends to the peripheral visual field.
  • To determine if visual processing enhancements in deaf individuals are limited to specific features or locations.

Main Methods:

  • A face matching task was employed to assess face discrimination accuracy.
  • Performance was compared between deaf and hearing participants for stimuli presented centrally and peripherally.

Main Results:

  • Deaf participants demonstrated superior accuracy in discriminating faces compared to hearing participants.
  • Enhanced face discrimination was observed in both central and peripheral visual fields for deaf individuals.

Conclusions:

  • Deaf individuals possess enhanced face discrimination abilities that extend to the peripheral visual field.
  • These findings support cross-modal plasticity and challenge the notion that face processing declines with eccentricity for deaf individuals.