Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Linear Stapler versus Circular Stapler for Patients Undergoing Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Gastric Surgery: A
Tao Jin1,2, Han-Dong Liu3, Ze-Hua Chen1,2
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Background:
Anastomotic devices, including linear staplers (LSs) and circular staplers (CSs), have been widely used after laparoscopic gastric surgery. However, it is controversial whether linear stapling is superior to circular stapling for anastomosis. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the aspects of postoperative complications, particularly anastomotic stricture and anastomotic leakage, on the use of the two techniques to assist clinical decision-making.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic search using Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library to evaluate studies that compared LSs and CSs after laparoscopic gastric surgery.
Results:
Pooled analysis suggested that patients who received LSs had fewer postoperative complications (P = 0.019), and anastomotic complications (P < 0.001), stricture (P = 0.001), and bleeding (P = 0.005). The subgroup analyses showed that LSs caused fewer anastomotic complications (P < 0.001), anastomotic strictures (P < 0.001), and postoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.007) in patients with gastric cancer than CS. In addition, LSs caused fewer incidences of overall morbidity (P = 0.042), anastomotic strictures (P = 0.023), postoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.001), wound infection (P < 0.001), and shorter length of hospital stay (P = 0.048) in patients with obesity. Furthermore, the subgroup analyses showed that the use of LS resulted in lower overall morbidity (P = 0.042), anastomotic stricture (P = 0.023), wound infection (P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (P = 0.048), and postoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.001) when applied in gastrojejunostomy, while LSs resulted in fewer anastomotic complications (P < 0.001), anastomotic stricture (P = 0.016) than CS when applied in esophagojejunostomy.
Conclusion:
Compared with CSs, LSs yielded a lower incidence of overall morbidity, anastomotic complications, anastomotic stricture, bleeding, and wound infection, indicating that linear stapling is safer and more efficient than circular stapling when performing anastomosis after laparoscopic gastric surgery.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
03:32Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment
Published on: December 27, 2024