Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Bilateral internal thoracic artery versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery: A double meta-analytic
Stefano Urso1, Rafael Sadaba2, Jesús María González Martín3
1Cardiac Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Insights
Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting offers a survival advantage over single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery after 10 years in coronary surgery. This benefit is not observed within the first decade post-operation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Medical Research Methodology
Background:
- Investigating optimal graft selection for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is crucial for long-term patient outcomes.
- The use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) versus single internal thoracic artery (SITA) combined with a radial artery (RA) graft is a subject of ongoing debate.
Discussion:
- This study performed a double meta-analysis of propensity score-matched or adjusted studies to compare BITA and SITA+RA in CABG.
- The analysis focused on long-term mortality as the primary endpoint, utilizing both generic inverse variance and Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data methods.
Key Insights:
- BITA grafting demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit after 10 years compared to SITA+RA (HR 0.77, P=0.01).
- No significant survival difference was detected between the two grafting strategies within the first 10 years post-surgery (HR 0.99, P=0.93).
- Survival estimates at 15 years favored BITA (68.0%) over SITA+RA (63.9%).
Outlook:
- The findings suggest that BITA may be a superior choice for long-term survival in CABG patients.
- Further research could explore the specific mechanisms behind the delayed survival benefit of BITA grafts.
- Consideration of BITA grafting for younger patients or those anticipating long-term survival may be warranted.
Objectives:
We explored the current evidence on the best second conduit in coronary surgery carrying out a double meta-analysis of propensity score matched or adjusted studies comparing bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery.
Methods:
PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for propensity score matched or adjusted studies comparing BITA versus single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery. The end point was long-term mortality. Two statistical approaches were used: the generic inverse variance method and the pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data.
Results:
Twelve matched populations comparing 6450 patients with BITA versus 9428 patients with single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery were included in our meta-analysis. The generic inverse variance method showed a statistically significant survival benefit of the BITA group (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; P = .04). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of the BITA group were 97.0%, 91.3%, 80.0%, and 68.0%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of the single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery group were 97.3%, 91.5%, 79.9%, and 63.9%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data meta-analysis applied to very long follow-up time data, showed that BITA provided a survival benefit after 10 years from surgery (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94; P = .01). No differences in terms of survival between the 2 groups were detected when the analysis was focused on the first 10 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09; P = .93).
Conclusions:
The present meta-analysis suggests that double internal thoracic artery may provide, compared with single internal thoracic artery plus radial artery, a statistically significant survival advantage after 10 years of follow-up, but not before. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
The Arch of Aorta
Encircling the heart, the coronary arteries form a ring-like structure before...
Thoracic Aorta
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

