Robust and accurate estimation of cellular fraction from tissue omics data via ensemble deconvolution

Tissue-level omics data such as transcriptomics and epigenomics are an average across diverse cell types. To extract cell-type-specific (CTS) signals, dozens of cellular deconvolution methods have been proposed to infer cell-type fractions from tissue-level data. However, these methods produce vastly different results under various real data settings. Simulation-based benchmarking studies showed no universally best deconvolution approaches. There have been attempts of ensemble methods, but they only aggregate multiple single-cell references or reference-free deconvolution methods.

To achieve a robust estimation of cellular fractions, we proposed EnsDeconv (Ensemble Deconvolution), which adopts CTS robust regression to synthesize the results from 11 single deconvolution methods, 10 reference datasets, 5 marker gene selection procedures, 5 data normalizations and 2 transformations. Unlike most benchmarking studies based on simulations, we compiled four large real datasets of 4937 tissue samples in total with measured cellular fractions and bulk gene expression from different tissues. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrated that EnsDeconv yields more stable, robust and accurate fractions than existing methods. We illustrated that EnsDeconv estimated cellular fractions enable various CTS downstream analyses such as differential fractions associated with clinical variables. We further extended EnsDeconv to analyze bulk DNA methylation data.

EnsDeconv is freely available as an R-package from https://github.com/randel/EnsDeconv. The RNA microarray data from the TRAUMA study are available and can be accessed in GEO (GSE36809). The demographic and clinical phenotypes can be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding authors. The RNA-seq data from the EVAPR study cannot be shared publicly due to the privacy of individuals that participated in the clinical research in compliance with the IRB approval at the University of Pittsburgh. The RNA microarray data from the FHS study are available from dbGaP (phs000007.v32.p13). The RNA-seq data from ROS study is downloaded from AD Knowledge Portal.

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.