Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

3.9K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
3.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.5K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.0K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.0K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

13.7K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
13.7K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

8.1K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
8.1K
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

558
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
558

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Infarct Growth in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Subgroup Analysis From the RESIST Trial.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Cardiovascular hospitalizations among Danish seafarers: a nationwide register study.

International maritime health·2026
Same author

Backrest Position and Outcome in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Multi-Center Randomized Comparison Within the Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (DANOHCA) Trial.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Prophylactic Olanzapine Versus Placebo in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Comparison Within the Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (DANOHCA) Trial.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Trial: A Statistical Analysis Plan.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Dexamethasone Versus Placebo in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Comparison Within the Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Trial (DANOHCA).

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 26, 2025

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement
11:38

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement

Published on: January 17, 2015

31.0K

Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies.

Oke Gerke1,2, Andreas Kristian Pedersen3,4, Birgit Debrabant5

  • 1Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. oke.gerke@rsyd.dk.

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
|April 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper reviews sample size calculations for Bland-Altman agreement analyses. It provides recent recommendations for method comparison and observer variability studies, enhancing the reliability of quantitative measuring device comparisons.

Keywords:
AgreementBland-Altman analysisLimits of AgreementRepeatabilityReproducibilitySample size

More Related Videos

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.3K
Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 26, 2025

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement
11:38

An Innovative Method for Exosome Quantification and Size Measurement

Published on: January 17, 2015

31.0K
Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.3K
Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Devices
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • The Bland-Altman method is standard for comparing two quantitative measuring devices, first proposed in 1986.
  • Historically, sample size determination for agreement analyses was infrequently addressed.
  • Recent advancements have introduced various proposals for sample size calculations based on assessment methods and replicate numbers.

Discussion:

  • This work synthesizes recent developments in sample size considerations for agreement studies.
  • It differentiates between requirements for method comparison and observer variability studies.
  • The paper addresses the current state-of-the-art in analysis and reporting guidelines for agreement studies.

Key Insights:

  • Recent proposals offer guidance on sample size for Bland-Altman agreement analyses.
  • Distinguishing between study types (method comparison vs. observer variability) is crucial for accurate sample size planning.
  • Standardized reporting guidelines are essential for robust agreement study outcomes.

Outlook:

  • Further research may refine sample size methodologies for complex agreement scenarios.
  • Adoption of updated guidelines will improve the rigor of quantitative device comparisons.
  • This review aims to standardize best practices in agreement study design and reporting.