Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pedro Jesús Saturno-Hernández1, Ofelia Poblano-Verástegui2, Sergio Flores-Hernández3

  • 1Instituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaCentro de Investigación en Evaluación y Encuestas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de México. Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. pedro.saturno@insp.mx.

Salud Publica De Mexico
|April 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Salud publica de Mexico·2026
Same author

Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Mexico, a Case for Policy Transfer.

Risk management and healthcare policy·2025
Same author

Salud publica de Mexico·2025
Same author

Salud publica de Mexico·2025
Same author

[Cost-related discontinuation of pharmacological treatment. Mexican Health and Aging Survey 2015-2021].

Gaceta sanitaria·2025
Same author

Environmental management of disposed medications in Ibero-American Post-Consumer Program countries.

Gaceta sanitaria·2025

Hospital accreditation did not significantly impact the quality of care for newborns with neonatal sepsis, intrauterine hypoxia, prematurity, or perinatal asphyxia. Key clinical indicators showed no consistent differences between accredited and non-accredited facilities.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care quality
  • Healthcare accreditation impact
  • Clinical quality indicators

Background:

  • Neonatal conditions like sepsis, hypoxia, prematurity, and asphyxia require high-quality care.
  • Assessing the impact of hospital accreditation on neonatal care quality is crucial for improving outcomes.
  • Previous studies have explored accreditation's role in various medical fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the quality of care for neonates with specific conditions in accredited hospitals (HA) versus non-accredited hospitals (HNA).
  • To evaluate differences in infrastructure, equipment, supplies, quality management processes, and clinical indicators between HA and HNA.

Main Methods:

  • A study was conducted across 28 Ministry of Health hospitals in 11 Mexican states.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluations included infrastructure, equipment, supplies, quality management, and clinical indicators.
  • Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) was used to estimate compliance in HA and HNA.

    • Main Results:

    • Accredited hospitals (HA) showed significant advantages in equipment and supplies compared to non-accredited hospitals (HNA).
    • No significant differences were found in the existence or functioning of hospital committees.
    • Consistent or significant differences in clinical indicator compliance were not observed between HA and HNA.

    Conclusions:

    • Hospital accreditation for the selected neonatal diagnoses is not associated with demonstrable differences in the quality of care provided.
    • The findings suggest that accreditation status alone may not be a sufficient predictor of superior neonatal care quality for these conditions.