Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Feasibility and Clinical Evaluation of an Immersive Augmented Reality Surgical Headset Integrated with Swept-Source Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography for Ophthalmic Surgery in the DISCOVER Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Differences in Simulated Refractive Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) and Laser In-Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) for Myopia in Same-Eye Virtual Trials.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
07:29

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis

Published on: November 12, 2015

20.1K

Case for Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-linking.

William J Dupps1,2,3

  • 1Department of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Cornea
|April 19, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Epithelium removal in corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus may enhance treatment effectiveness, despite concerns about complications. Current evidence supports the standard epi-off protocol for stabilizing corneal ectatic disorders.

More Related Videos

Ex Vivo Corneal Organ Culture Model for Wound Healing Studies
06:46

Ex Vivo Corneal Organ Culture Model for Wound Healing Studies

Published on: February 15, 2019

11.9K
Establishing a Severe Corneal Inflammation Model in Rats Based on Corneal Epithelium Curettage Combined with Corneal Sutures
04:48

Establishing a Severe Corneal Inflammation Model in Rats Based on Corneal Epithelium Curettage Combined with Corneal Sutures

Published on: November 22, 2024

453

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
07:29

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis

Published on: November 12, 2015

20.1K
Ex Vivo Corneal Organ Culture Model for Wound Healing Studies
06:46

Ex Vivo Corneal Organ Culture Model for Wound Healing Studies

Published on: February 15, 2019

11.9K
Establishing a Severe Corneal Inflammation Model in Rats Based on Corneal Epithelium Curettage Combined with Corneal Sutures
04:48

Establishing a Severe Corneal Inflammation Model in Rats Based on Corneal Epithelium Curettage Combined with Corneal Sutures

Published on: November 22, 2024

453

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Corneal Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Corneal cross-linking (CXL) is a treatment for keratoconus and other corneal ectatic disorders.
  • The necessity of epithelium removal (epi-off) versus epithelium-on (epi-on) CXL remains a subject of debate.
  • Epi-on CXL aims to minimize vision-threatening complications associated with epithelial debridement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of epi-off versus epi-on corneal cross-linking.
  • To review the current evidence regarding clinical outcomes and complications of both CXL protocols.
  • To provide a perspective on the standard of care for corneal ectatic disorders.

Main Methods:

  • Review of high-level evidence and clinical outcome metrics.
  • Analysis of data on topographic flattening and disease stabilization.
  • Assessment of complication rates, including infectious keratitis and vision loss.

Main Results:

  • Most evidence indicates that epi-off CXL leads to greater effectiveness in topographic flattening and disease stabilization.
  • High-quality evidence supporting a significant reduction in debridement-related complications for epi-on CXL is lacking.
  • The FDA-approved epi-off protocol remains the benchmark for safe and effective treatment.

Conclusions:

  • The epi-off protocol for corneal cross-linking is currently considered the standard for effective treatment of corneal ectatic diseases.
  • Further comparative effectiveness trials and long-term studies are needed to definitively establish the benefits of epi-on CXL.
  • Current evidence favors epi-off CXL for achieving optimal clinical outcomes in keratoconus management.