The Relationship Between Inter-canthal Distance and Implant Height in Asian Rhinoplasty

Augmentation rhinoplasty is one of the top three anesthetic surgeries in Asia. I-shaped silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene composite implants are feasible for both primary and secondary augmentation rhinoplasty in Asians. This series was to analyze and evaluated the effect of the rhinoplasty to the intercanthal distance and to compare the height of the implantation with those differences in ICD before and after rhinoplasty. We retrospectively reviewed data from a single medical center via a single surgeon (Hsiao YC), at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, between 2011 and 2017 with follow-up through 2018. There were 223 patients who received augmentation rhinoplasty with an I-shaped composite silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene ePTFE-lined silicone dorsal composite implant (Implantech, Ventura, CA) with a glabellar component (chimeric technique) or without a glabellar component. There were 169 patients with the height of the I-shaped composite implant over 3 mm, and 15 patients were less than 3 mm. There was no distribution significance between two groups even in gender, age, type of surgery, or indication. The paired difference of ICD/IPD ratio was statistically significant in the group with the height of composite implant over 3 mm (1.04% ± 0.11, p < 0.005, 95%). The normalized ratio of the ICD to IPD is estimated to decrease by 1-2%. Appropriate candidates including those with a wide ICD should be informed about these data during preoperative decision-making.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .