Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat
Published on: April 26, 2013
Gene-Edited Meat: Disentangling Consumers' Attitudes and Potential Purchase Behavior
Daniel Martin-Collado1,2, Tim J Byrne3, Jonh J Crowley3,4
1Department of Animal Science, Agrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragon (CITA), Zaragoza, Spain.
Gene-editing (GE) in livestock offers benefits but faces social controversy. Consumers perceive GE meat quality holistically, with animal welfare benefits most influencing purchasing decisions for moderate and pro-GE groups.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural biotechnology
- Consumer behavior studies
- Food technology and safety
Background:
- Gene-editing (GE) technologies present novel solutions for livestock productivity, sustainability, and food security.
- Previous genetic modification technologies in food production have historically generated social controversy and opposition.
- Understanding public perception is crucial for the adoption of GE meat products in the food industry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore public attitudes towards gene-edited meat products.
- To investigate consumption predisposition towards GE meat, considering potential added benefits in livestock farming.
- To analyze how societal perception of GE technology influences consumer acceptance of meat products.
Main Methods:
- Exploratory research on societal perception of gene-editing technology in livestock.
- Analysis of consumer attitudes and consumption predisposition towards gene-edited meat.
- Evaluation of the impact of added benefits (animal welfare, environment, human health) and price discounts on consumer acceptance.
Main Results:
- Societal perception of GE meat is often holistic, with GE technology acting as a cue for overall product quality.
- Consumers with anti-GE attitudes showed little sensitivity to price discounts or added benefits.
- Added benefits significantly increased consumption predisposition among moderate and pro-GE consumers, with animal welfare benefits having the greatest impact.
Conclusions:
- Public perception of gene-editing technology in meat production is complex and influenced by perceived quality cues.
- Targeted communication emphasizing animal welfare benefits can enhance consumer acceptance of gene-edited meat products.
- Further research is needed to address social controversies and foster broader acceptance of GE technologies in the food industry.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
09:43Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
Published on: January 3, 2025
Related Concept Videos
What is Genetic Engineering?
CRISPR
Transgenic Plants
The first-ever transgenic plant was a tobacco plant developed in 1983 that showed resistance against the tobacco mosaic virus. Since then, many transgenic plants have been developed and commercialized for improving the agricultural, ornamental, and horticultural value of a crop plant. Transgenic...
Transgenic Organisms
Recombinant DNA
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology