Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiation risks in perspective.

E E Pochin

    The British Journal of Radiology
    |January 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Estimating radiation risks is challenging due to predictive needs, unlike other known risks. Research focuses on low-dose radiation effects and developing consensus on risk comparison.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Distribution of radioiodide in man.

    Clinical science·2014
    Same author

    The metabolism of radiothyroxine in man.

    Clinical science·2014
    Same author

    Industrial risk perceptions.

    Health physics·1988
    Same author

    Radiation and mental retardation.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1988
    Same author

    The 10-day recommendation.

    Clinical radiology·1986
    Same author

    Radiation and an index of harm.

    Progress in clinical and biological research·1986
    Same journal

    Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Utility of High-Resolution Semiconductor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Breast Cancer Extent: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Airway Imaging Practices in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Global Survey to Guide Standardized Guidelines.

    The British journal of radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiation risk assessment
    • Occupational and public health

    Background:

    • Radiation risks are primarily estimated predictively, unlike other occupational and public risks with established data.
    • Low effective dose rates (<3 mSv/year) from natural, occupational, and public exposures present unique challenges.
    • Epidemiological studies at low doses are complicated by large sample size requirements and long latency periods for radiation effects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the difficulties in presenting radiation risks in proper perspective.
    • To explore methods for estimating carcinogenic and inheritable risks from radiation exposure.
    • To facilitate an informed consensus on comparing radiation risks with other hazards.

    Main Methods:

    • Predictive estimation of radiation risks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of methods for inferring low-dose risks from higher-dose data.
  • Analysis of risks for carcinogenic, inheritable, and developmental abnormalities.

    • Main Results:

    • Adequate estimates are now available for carcinogenic risks at higher doses and for the whole body.
    • Modes of inference to estimate risks at lower doses have been established.
    • Estimates for risks of inheritable and developmental abnormalities can be made.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparing radiation risks with other hazards requires an informed consensus on risk weighting.
    • Further development is needed to place all radiation risks in perspective with other occupational and public risks.