Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
A Narrative Review of the Classical and Modern Diagnostic Methods of the No-Reflow Phenomenon
Larisa Renata Pantea-Roșan1, Simona Gabriela Bungau2,3, Andrei-Flavius Radu2,4
1Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
Insights
The no-reflow phenomenon
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Myocardial Reperfusion Injury
Background:
- The no-reflow (NR) phenomenon, a critical complication in acute myocardial infarction, is characterized by impaired myocardial blood flow despite successful epicardial artery recanalization.
- Diagnostic criteria for NR vary, impacting reported incidence rates. Angiographic criteria (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2) suggest low incidence, whereas myocardial blush imaging reveals a higher prevalence.
- Early diagnosis and targeted treatment are crucial for NR reversibility and improved patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of diagnostic tools for detecting the no-reflow phenomenon.
- To enhance the understanding and management of arterial microvasculature damage in cardiology.
- To highlight the clinical significance of NR due to its association with adverse cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of current literature on no-reflow phenomenon diagnosis.
- Analysis of diagnostic criteria, including angiographic assessment and myocardial blush imaging.
- Discussion of the implications of different diagnostic approaches on NR incidence and management.
Main Results:
- The incidence of NR is significantly underestimated when relying solely on angiographic criteria.
- Myocardial blush imaging provides a more accurate assessment of NR, revealing a higher prevalence.
- Early detection of NR is essential for initiating timely and effective interventions.
Conclusions:
- Accurate diagnosis of the no-reflow phenomenon is critical for effective patient management.
- Improved diagnostic strategies are needed to identify NR and guide treatment decisions.
- Addressing NR is paramount for improving the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular diseases and microvascular damage.
Abstract:
The incidence of the no-reflow (NR) phenomenon varies depending on the diagnostic criteria used. If just the angiographic criteria are considered (i.e., a degree of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction ≤2), it will be found that the incidence of NR is quite low; on the other hand, when the myocardial NR is taken into account (i.e., a decrease in the quality of myocardial reperfusion expressed by the degree of myocardial blush), the real incidence is higher. Thus, the early establishment of a diagnosis of NR and the administration of specific treatment can lead to its reversibility. Otherwise, regardless of the follow-up period, patients with NR have a poor prognosis. In the present work, we offer a comprehensive perspective on diagnostic tools for NR detection, for improving the global management of patients with arterial microvasculature damage, which is a topic of major interest in the cardiology field, due to its complexity and its link with severe clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:27Real-Time Assessment of Spinal Cord Microperfusion in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion
Published on: December 10, 2020
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018