Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Information processing in magnetic resonance imaging.

N M Hylton, D A Ortendahl

    Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    ASO Visual Abstract: Disparities in the Surgical Management of the Axilla by Self-Identified Race in the Multicenter Neoadjuvant I-SPY2 Trial.

    Annals of surgical oncology·2025
    Same author

    I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2009
    Same author

    MRI methods for evaluating the effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitor administration used to enhance chemotherapy efficiency in a breast tumor xenograft model.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2009
    Same author

    Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2001
    Same author

    Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.

    Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2001
    Same author

    Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2001
    Same journal

    The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of osteoid osteoma: a pictorial review.

    Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging·2002
    Same journal

    Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: pattern of disease at spiral CT.

    Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging·2002
    Same journal

    Helical CT of musculoskeletal infection.

    Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging·2001
    Same journal

    Review: the pericardium--a computed tomography perspective.

    Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging·2001
    Same journal

    CT colonography: new concepts in image display and analysis.

    Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging·2001
    Same journal

    Imaging options.

    Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging·2001
    See all related articles

    Image processing models predict magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity changes. This allows generating new images from existing data, enabling simulations of new techniques and parameter variations without repeat scans.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Biophysics
    • Computer Vision

    Background:

    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a powerful diagnostic tool.
    • Extracting quantitative information from MRI signals is crucial for advanced applications.
    • Current methods may require extensive data acquisition or are limited in parameter flexibility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop advanced image processing techniques for MRI data.
    • To model nuclear responses to magnetic stimulations for signal prediction.
    • To enable the generation of novel image contrasts and representations from limited acquired data.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed computational models of nuclear spin response to magnetic field sequences.
    • Utilized image processing algorithms to predict signal intensity variations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Implemented methods for calculating new image contrasts from existing datasets.
  • Created tissue type maps for enhanced image interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Successfully modeled the relationship between magnetic resonance parameters and signal intensity.
    • Demonstrated the ability to generate new, informative MRI contrasts without additional scans.
    • Enabled simulation of parameter variations, including unfeasible ones like field strength.
    • Produced tissue type maps for clearer identification of tissue categories.

    Conclusions:

    • Image processing offers a powerful approach to extract more information from MRI data.
    • Predictive modeling allows for the exploration of new imaging techniques and parameters virtually.
    • This methodology enhances MRI interpretation and reduces the need for repeated acquisitions.