Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025
Synthesis of Soft Polysiloxane-urea Elastomers for Intraocular Lens Application
Published on: March 8, 2019
Comparison Between L-312 Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic Acrylate and US-860 UV Hydrophilic Acrylate IOL Opacification
Jin Xie1,2,3, Jie Sun2,4, Ting Liu2,3
1Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate College of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Objective:
To compare opacity characteristics of US-860 UV and L-312 IOL, and report the phenomenon of glistenings in hydrophobic-hydrophilic acrylic IOLs.
Setting:
Qingdao Eye Hospital.
Design:
Experimental study.
Methods:
Four medical records (4 eyes) of patients with L-312 or US-860 UV IOL opacification reporting decreased or lost vision who underwent IOL explanation between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed. Explanted IOLs were analyzed by slit-lamp examination, confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) at Qingdao Eye Hospital and Qingdao university of science and technology.
Results:
The 4 explanted IOLs were represented by 2 hydrophilic acrylic designs. The preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity changed from 1.84 ± 1.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) to 0.20 ± 0.03 log MAR postoperatively except case 3. The mean interval of the L-312 IOL was 56.67 ± 14.19 months (range 44 to 72 months), and the interval of the US-860 UV IOL was 27 months. Morphological findings were surface, subsurface calcifications of the US-860 UV IOL material, and the optical region of L-312 IOLs are teeming with a great number of vacuoles by light microscope, scanning electron microscope and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectral.
Conclusion:
The cause of US-860 UV opacification was primary calcification, and vacuoles resulted in L-312 IOL opacification.
