Considerations in the choice of sutures for wound closure of the genitourinary tract

The ideal suture for use within the urinary tract should maintain its tensile strength until wound repair is satisfactory and then it should undergo rapid total absorption without promoting stone formation. The bladder has a great potential for repair, attaining 100 per cent of the strength of the unwounded tissue in 14 to 21 days. Braided synthetic absorbable sutures appear to be suited ideally for closure of incised wounds of a urinary conduit. They maintain their tensile strength for approximately 21 days, during which time the healing tissues regain strength rapidly. Because sutures are foreign bodies and have access to urine, they may serve as a nidus for stone formation. Several factors that have been identified as important determinants of foreign body urolithiasis include the presence of urine, urine volume and pH, infection, physical and chemical configuration of the foreign body, and animal species. The incidence of suture urolithiasis is related directly to the duration in which the sutures are present in the urinary tract. Consequently, absorbable sutures are preferred over nonabsorbable sutures for closure of wounds of the urinary conduit. In the absence of infection braided synthetic absorbable sutures have distinct advantages over gut sutures for closure of urinary tract wounds. They are absorbed by nonenzymatic hydrolysis in a predictable manner with limited inflammatory response. In contrast, gut sutures have an unpredictable absorption rate by enzymatic degradation and elicit an exaggerated inflammatory response. Because infected urine, especially Proteus species, accelerates the degradation of absorbable synthetic sutures to a greater degree than gut sutures, wound closure in the presence of infection should be accomplished with the absorbable natural fiber suture. Nonabsorbable sutures or staples should not be used in the urinary tract because they predictably promote urolithiasis.