Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

276
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
276
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

566
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
566
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.2K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.2K
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

7
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
7
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

185
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
185
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

224
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
224

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitoring With HbA<sub>1c</sub> to Improve the Detection of Prediabetes in Asian Individuals: Model Development Study.

JMIR diabetes·2026
Same author

Clinical vs. statistical significance: considerations for clinical laboratories.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Comments to the International Council for Standardization in Hematology Guidance for New Lot Verification of Coagulation Reagents, Calibrators, and Controls.

Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis·2025
Same author

A comparison of fetal hemoglobin interference in routine high-performance liquid chromatography, immunoassay, and enzymatic methods of glycated hemoglobin measurement.

Laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

A curious case of a negative control line on a dengue duo assay due to interference - A case report.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2024
Same author

Measuring bile acids: Are we all talking the same language?

Obstetric medicine·2024
Same journal

Performance of the Line Blot Immunoassay for Detecting Myositis Autoantibodies in Real-Life Laboratory Settings: An Italian Multicenter Study.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Comparative Evaluation of the ASAP and GAAD Algorithms for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection in a Chronic Liver Disease Cohort in Korea.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Toward a More Complete High-Resolution Human Leukocyte Antigen Reference for Koreans.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Essential Data Elements for Laboratory Test Interoperability: An Expert Consensus-Based Framework.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Bridging Genotypic and Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>: A Baseline Prior to the Widespread Use of New and Repurposed Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same journal

Epidemiological and Clinical Microbiological Characteristics of <i>Staphylococcus argenteus</i> Isolated From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Korea in 2021-2024.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 25, 2025

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
09:33

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology

Published on: February 7, 2015

16.5K

An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits.

Tze Ping Loh1, Rui Zhen Tan2, Chun Yee Lim2

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Annals of Laboratory Medicine
|April 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents an objective method to assess autoverification rules for clinical laboratories. It uses probability theory to calculate clinical sensitivity and specificity, enabling labs to manage risk effectively.

Keywords:
Autoverification limitAutoverification ruleClinical performanceLaboratory errorProbability theory

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
07:43

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices

Published on: July 14, 2023

2.5K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

547

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 25, 2025

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
09:33

A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology

Published on: February 7, 2015

16.5K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
07:43

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices

Published on: July 14, 2023

2.5K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

547

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Autoverification of laboratory results is crucial for efficiency.
  • Objective methods are needed to evaluate the performance of autoverification rules.
  • Current practices may lack standardized approaches for assessing clinical impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and describe an objective approach for deriving the clinical performance of autoverification rules.
  • To provide a framework for laboratories to implement and assess these rules based on desired risk profiles.
  • To inform laboratory practice regarding the effective use of autoverification.

Main Methods:

  • Collected and Box-Cox transformed anonymized historical laboratory data for 12 biochemistry measurands.
  • Applied probability theory to derive clinical specificity using percentile values (5th and 95th).
  • Calculated clinical sensitivity using Z-values and standard normal distribution, considering tolerable total error.

Main Results:

  • Achieved 90% clinical specificity by utilizing the 5th and 95th percentile values.
  • Demonstrated an inverse relationship between clinical sensitivity and between-subject biological variation.
  • The method allows for setting and assessing autoverification rules aligned with laboratory-specific risk tolerance.

Conclusions:

  • An objective, probability-based approach can effectively evaluate autoverification rule performance.
  • Laboratories can utilize this method to tailor autoverification strategies to their specific needs and risk appetite.
  • This framework supports informed decision-making in the implementation of laboratory autoverification systems.