Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Probing the Brain in Autism Using fMRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: September 12, 2011
Quantitative MRI Characterization of the Extremely Preterm Brain at Adolescence: Atypical versus Neurotypical
Ryan McNaughton1, Chris Pieper1, Osamu Sakai1
1From the Departments of Mechanical Engineering (R.M., X.Z.) and Biomedical Engineering (H.J.), Boston University College of Engineering, Boston, Mass; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 670 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118 (C.P., O.S., H.J.); Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC (J.V.R., T.M.O.); Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Mass (D.N.K., J.A.F.); Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (L.D.); Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (T.H.); and Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC (R.C.F.).
Insights
Extremely preterm birth impacts brain development, with quantitative MRI revealing sex-specific differences in neurotypically and atypically developing adolescents. These findings highlight distinct white matter alterations in girls and boys, influencing neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Radiology
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Extremely preterm (EP) birth increases the risk of perinatal white matter (WM) injury, potentially leading to adverse neurologic and neurocognitive outcomes.
- Quantitative MRI (qMRI) biomarkers are crucial for understanding the antecedents, clinical correlates, and prognoses of neurologic disorders in EP-born individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare multiparametric qMRI parameters in adolescents born EP, differentiating between those with and without neurodevelopmental disorders (autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, cognitive impairment).
- To characterize sex-stratified brain development in EP-born adolescents using qMRI.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicenter study of 368 adolescents (aged 14-16 years) born EP, part of the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns-Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ELGAN-ECHO) study.
- Participants underwent 3.0-T MRI scans between 2017 and 2019.
- Sex-stratified multiple regression models analyzed associations between qMRI parameters (spatial entropy density [SEd], T1, T2, cerebrospinal fluid-normalized proton density [nPD], and CSF volume), with interaction terms for developmental status.
Main Results:
- Atypically developing girls exhibited lower WM nPD compared to neurotypically developing girls.
- Atypically developing boys showed longer WM T1 and a more moderate association between T1 and WM microstructural organization (SEd) compared to neurotypically developing boys.
- Sex differences were observed: atypically developing girls had lower nPD and shorter T2 than atypically developing boys.
Conclusions:
- Adolescents born EP with atypical development display sexual dimorphisms in WM and gray matter qMRI parameters, specifically nPD and T2.
- These findings underscore distinct patterns of brain development and microstructural organization related to sex in EP-born individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Abstract:
Background Extremely preterm (EP) birth is associated with higher risks of perinatal white matter (WM) injury, potentially causing abnormal neurologic and neurocognitive outcomes. MRI biomarkers distinguishing individuals with and without neurologic disorder guide research on EP birth antecedents, clinical correlates, and prognoses. Purpose To compare multiparametric quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters of EP-born adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, or cognitive impairment (ie, atypically developing) with those without (ie, neurotypically developing), characterizing sex-stratified brain development. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter study included individuals aged 14-16 years born EP (Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns-Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes Study, or ELGAN-ECHO). Participants underwent 3.0-T MRI evaluation from 2017 to 2019. qMRI outcomes were compared for atypically versus neurotypically developing adolescents and for girls versus boys. Sex-stratified multiple regression models were used to examine associations between spatial entropy density (SEd) and T1, T2, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-normalized proton density (nPD), and between CSF volume and T2. Interaction terms modeled differences in slopes between atypically versus neurotypically developing adolescents. Results A total of 368 adolescents were classified as 116 atypically (66 boys) and 252 neurotypically developing (125 boys) participants. Atypically versus neurotypically developing girls had lower nPD (mean, 557 10 × percent unit [pu] ± 46 [SD] vs 573 10 × pu ± 43; P = .04), while atypically versus neurotypically developing boys had longer T1 (814 msec ± 57 vs 789 msec ± 82; P = .01). Atypically developing girls versus boys had lower nPD and shorter T2 (eg, in WM, 557 10 × pu ± 46 vs 580 10 × pu ± 39 for nPD [P = .006] and 86 msec ± 3 vs 88 msec ± 4 for T2 [P = .003]). Atypically versus neurotypically developing boys had a more moderate negative association between T1 and SEd (slope, -32.0 msec per kB/cm3 [95% CI: -49.8, -14.2] vs -62.3 msec per kB/cm3 [95% CI: -79.7, -45.0]; P = .03). Conclusion Atypically developing participants showed sexual dimorphisms in the cerebrospinal fluid-normalized proton density (nPD) and T2 of both white matter (WM) and gray matter. Atypically versus neurotypically developing girls had lower WM nPD, while atypically versus neurotypically developing boys had longer WM T1 and more moderate T1 associations with microstructural organization in WM. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...

