Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response to Bakker et al.

Jacqueline A Robinson1, Rauri C K Bowie2, Olga Dudchenko3

  • 1Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Current Biology : CB
|April 26, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unconventional centromere architectures in Tapirus indicus reveal hotspots for satellite-free centromere formation in Perissodactyla.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Long-term isolation and introgression shape the genomic distinctiveness of Rice's Whale.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Census and genetic analysis of the United States marmoset population.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A planning framework for coordinated global action to prevent cyclone-driven extinctions.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Diploid dual assemblies reveal the telocentric structure and extensive allelic heterogeneity of canine genomes.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Common Coronary Artery Disease Risk Variants in Endothelial Regulatory Elements Modulate Tetraspanin 14 Expression and Notch Signaling.

Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology·2026
This summary is machine-generated.

Robinson et al. address Bakker et al.

Area of Science:

  • This research falls within the field of scientific discourse and academic response.

Background:

  • The study involves a response from Robinson and colleagues to critiques presented by Bakker et al.

Discussion:

  • The core of the work is a rebuttal and clarification of points previously raised by another research group.

Key Insights:

  • The authors provide counterarguments and additional context to their original findings.

Outlook:

  • This exchange highlights the dynamic nature of scientific peer review and ongoing research dialogues.

Related Experiment Videos