Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Outcomes Following Standardized Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Reprogramming
Matthew Martini1, Matthew Kalscheur1,2, Erin Dehn2
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
Implementing standardized programming for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) significantly reduced inappropriate therapies and syncope. This evidence-based approach to ICD programming improves patient outcomes without increasing adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Clinical Electrophysiology
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials show longer detection intervals and higher detection rates in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce inappropriate therapy delivery.
- Evidence-based ICD programming is inconsistently implemented in the US, leading to significant provider variability, especially for previously implanted devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate an institutionally standardized ICD reprogramming protocol for primary prevention devices.
- To assess the impact of this standardized protocol on inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies, syncope, and healthcare utilization compared to a historical cohort.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 193 patients with primary prevention ICDs who underwent standardized reprogramming with high detection rates and long detection intervals.
- A historical cohort of 254 patients with ICDs programmed with non-standardized settings served as the comparison group.
- Outcomes including appropriate/inappropriate therapy, syncope, emergency department/urgent care visits, hospitalization, and mortality were compared over a 1-year period.
Main Results:
- Standardized reprogramming significantly reduced the prevalence of inappropriate ICD therapy (0% vs. 2.4%, P=.04) and syncope (0% vs. 2.8%, P=.02).
- A trend towards lower appropriate therapy rates was observed in the reprogrammed group (4.1% vs. 7.1%, P=.19), but this was not statistically significant.
- No significant differences were found in emergency department/urgent care utilization or mortality between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Prospective, standardized reprogramming of primary prevention ICDs using evidence-based settings (high detection rates, long intervals) is effective in reducing inappropriate therapies and syncope.
- This protocol promotes high adherence to evidence-based practices and can be implemented without negatively impacting appropriate therapies or patient mortality.
- Standardized ICD programming represents a valuable strategy for optimizing patient care and device efficacy.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management