Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish
Published on: May 14, 2010
Theoretical report: reflections and considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors
Breno Augusto Bormann de Souza Filho1,2, Érika Fernandes Tritany3,4, Cláudio José Struchiner5,6
1Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Epidemiologia em Saúde Pública. Programa de Doutorado em Epidemiologia em Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Abstract:
Epidemiological studies focused on public health have currently shown significant limitations regarding in-depth theoretical reports, overvaluing methodological aspects. The lack of theoretical explanation affects both the quality and reproducibility of studies. This study therefore reflected on the importance of in-depth theoretical reports considering the theoretical foundation used by researchers in the main sections of the manuscript (title, abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion) based on a review of the scientific literature on the subject. We believe that this article can help understand the importance and the development of in-depth theoretical reports in scientific articles, contributing to assessments, interpretations, and criticisms of reviewers and editors regarding the explanation and reporting of theoretical foundation in manuscripts submitted to scientific journals.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Introspection
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Proofreading
Feedback Loops
Feedback Inhibition

