Symptoms and PCR testing interval for bacterial pathogens in patients with diarrhoea

Lisanne van Berkel1,2, Maarten Heuvelmans3, Jan F Monkelbaan1

  • 1Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Insights

Early polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia enterocolitica, Campylobacter, and Plesiomonas shigelloides (SSYCP) correlates with more positive results in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. However, PCR for SSYCP has limited clinical use in diagnosing chronic diarrhoea.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Acute diarrhoea can be caused by specific bacterial pathogens including Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia enterocolitica, Campylobacter, and Plesiomonas shigelloides (SSYCP).
  • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is often used in clinical practice for SSYCP detection, even in patients presenting with chronic diarrhoea and gastrointestinal complaints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical utility of PCR testing for SSYCP in patients with chronic diarrhoea and gastrointestinal symptoms.
  • To determine if earlier testing for SSYCP leads to a higher detection rate.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of medical records from January 2017 to December 2018.
  • Inclusion of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and available PCR results for SSYCP.
  • Comparison of symptom-to-testing intervals (STI) between PCR-positive and PCR-negative patient groups.

Main Results:

  • Early testing (STI <7 days) was associated with a higher proportion of positive PCR results (55% vs. 38%).
  • A significant portion of PCR-positive patients (one-third) had an STI greater than 7 days.
  • Recent antibiotic use correlated with negative PCR results, while immunocompromised and admitted patients showed shorter STIs.

Conclusions:

  • Early PCR testing for SSYCP is linked to increased positive results but has limited diagnostic value for chronic diarrhoea.
  • Recent antibiotic use can influence PCR test outcomes, necessitating careful interpretation.
  • Standardized symptom documentation is crucial for clinical practice and research in gastrointestinal diagnostics.

Related Concept Videos

Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents01:18

Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents

Acute diarrhea, a common gastrointestinal disturbance, is characterized by the rapid evacuation of fluid stools, leading to an excessive weight in fluid. This condition typically arises from disorders affecting intestinal water and electrolyte transport. It can be triggered by an increased osmotic load within the intestine, excessive secretion of electrolytes and water, mucosal exudation of protein and fluid, or altered intestinal motility. The primary risks of acute diarrhea are dehydration...
214
Real Time RT-PCR02:57

Real Time RT-PCR

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, or Real-time RT-PCR, is an analytical tool used to determine the expression level of target genes. The method involves converting mRNA to complementary DNA with the help of an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase, followed by the PCR amplification of the cDNA. These two processes can be performed simultaneously in a single tube or separately as a two-step reaction.
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
60.7K
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
215