Related Concept Videos
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Design Example: Distributing Reinforcements in Concrete Sections
Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses
Graded and Abrupt Responses
Some signaling systems generate...
Design Example: Designing Water Slide
Bernoulli's principle determines the water's velocity along the...
Experimental Designs
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Using ePortfolios to Assess the Influence of Community Engagement on Undergraduates' Socially Responsible Leadership Development.
Student Leadership Development in a Gen-AI Higher Education Landscape: Four Imperatives for the Future.
Practice of Active Waiting: Leadership Education Curricula in Uncertain Times.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Diversity of engineering leadership program design.
John R Donald1, Marnie V Jamieson2
1University of Guelph, Canada.
This study compares seven North American engineering leadership programs, examining their origins, structures, and teaching methods. It highlights the diverse approaches in developing engineering leaders.
More Related Videos
Area of Science:
- Engineering Education
- Leadership Studies
- Management Science
Background:
- Engineering leadership programs are crucial for developing technical and managerial skills.
- A comprehensive understanding of the landscape of these programs is lacking.
- North American institutions offer various approaches to engineering leadership development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare the diversity of seven North American engineering leadership programs.
- To identify commonalities and differences in program design and implementation.
- To provide insights into effective strategies for engineering leadership education.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of seven engineering leadership programs.
- Examination of program origins, definitions, structure, and instructional strategies.
- Review of research and program evaluation methodologies.
Main Results:
- Significant diversity exists in the foundational elements and operational strategies of engineering leadership programs.
- Variations observed in curriculum design, pedagogical approaches, and assessment methods.
- Distinct approaches to research integration and program evaluation were identified across programs.
Conclusions:
- Engineering leadership programs exhibit considerable heterogeneity in their design and execution.
- Understanding this diversity is key to advancing the field and tailoring educational experiences.
- Further research can leverage these findings to develop best practices and innovative models for engineering leadership development.

