Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Spatiotemporal changes and driving forces of ecosystem vulnerability in the Yangtze River Basin, China:
Zhenzhen Pan1, Guangyao Gao2, Bojie Fu2
1State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Ecosystem vulnerability in the Yangtze River Basin generally decreased from 1990-2018, with climate change and human activities driving these changes. Ecological protection efforts and warming trends aided vulnerability reduction.
Area of Science:
- Ecological assessment
- Environmental science
- Spatial analysis
Background:
- Ecosystem vulnerability is critical for regional ecological protection and management.
- Previous studies lack comprehensive assessment of spatial heterogeneity impacts on ecosystem vulnerability.
- Understanding drivers of ecosystem vulnerability variation is essential for conservation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ecosystem vulnerability pattern in the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) using a habitat-structure-function framework.
- To examine the spatial heterogeneity impacts of climate change and human activities on ecosystem vulnerability variation from 1990 to 2018.
- To provide policy recommendations for ecosystem conservation and management in the YRB.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a habitat-structure-function framework for ecosystem vulnerability assessment.
- Utilized the Geographically Weighted Regression model to analyze spatial heterogeneity impacts.
- Analyzed data for the Yangtze River Basin from 1990 to 2018.
Main Results:
- The ecosystem vulnerability index (EVI) generally decreased from upstream to downstream in the YRB.
- 63.85% of the basin experienced a decline in EVI, primarily in the source, southwest, and north regions.
- Climate change impact on EVI increased with time scales, while human activities remained the dominant driver. Areas with increased EVI were mainly in the southeast and east.
Conclusions:
- Climate warming, humid trends, and strengthened ecological protection benefited EVI decline.
- Climate change impacts were concentrated in the source and upper reaches, while human activities impacted the entire basin.
- The proposed framework is extendable for assessing vulnerability in other regions and ecosystem types.
Related Concept Videos
Habitat Fragmentation
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Threats to Biodiversity
Ecological Disturbance
What is an Ecosystem?

