Using Occlusion-Based Saliency Maps to Explain an Artificial Intelligence Tool in Lung Cancer Screening: Agreement...

Occlusion-based saliency maps (OBSMs) are one of the approaches for interpreting decision-making process of an artificial intelligence (AI) system. This study explores the agreement among text responses from a cohort of radiologists to describe diagnostically relevant areas on low-dose CT (LDCT) images. It also explores if radiologists' descriptions of cases misclassified by the AI provide a rationale for ruling out the AI's output. The OBSM indicating the importance of different pixels on the final decision made by an AI were generated for 10 benign cases (3 misclassified by the AI tool as malignant) and 10 malignant cases (2 misclassified by the AI tool as benign). Thirty-six radiologists were asked to use radiological vocabulary, typical to reporting LDCT scans, to describe the mapped regions of interest (ROI). The radiologists' annotations were then grouped by using a clustering-based technique. Topics were extracted from the annotations and for each ROI, a percentage of annotations containing each topic were found. Radiologists annotated 17 and 24 unique ROIs on benign and malignant cases, respectively. Agreement on the main label (e.g., "vessel," "nodule") by radiologists was only seen in only in 12% of all areas (5/41 ROI). Topic analyses identified six descriptors which are commonly associated with a lower malignancy likelihood. Eight common topics related to a higher malignancy likelihood were also determined. Occlusion-based saliency maps were used to explain an AI decision-making process to radiologists, who in turn have provided insight into the level of agreement between the AI's decision and radiological lexicon.