Related Experiment Videos

Successful management of daytime enuresis using alarm procedures: a randomly controlled trial

Insights

A study on daytime wetting in children found that non-contingent alarm devices were as effective as contingent ones. These alarms offer a recommended solution for diurnal enuresis, though some relapse occurred later.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Urology
  • Behavioral Medicine

Background:

  • Daytime wetting (diurnal enuresis) affects many children, impacting their quality of life.
  • Alarm therapy is a common treatment for enuresis, but the optimal type of alarm is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of contingent versus non-contingent alarm devices in treating daytime wetting in children.
  • To determine if a simpler, non-contingent alarm is a viable alternative for routine clinical use.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 44 children with daytime wetting.
  • Comparison of two alarm types: contingent (sounds upon wetting) and non-contingent (timed intervals).
  • Quota allocation ensured group comparability; response and relapse rates were monitored.

Main Results:

  • Two-thirds of children responded to alarm therapy, achieving dryness.
  • The non-contingent alarm demonstrated comparable efficacy to the contingent alarm.
  • A relapse rate of 23% was observed up to two years post-treatment.

Conclusions:

  • Non-contingent alarm devices are effective for treating daytime enuresis in children.
  • The non-contingent alarm is recommended for routine use due to its comparable efficacy and potential simplicity.
  • Long-term follow-up is necessary to monitor relapse rates in children treated for diurnal enuresis.

Related Concept Videos