Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

08:05
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
2.7K
Material Benefits Crowd Out Moralistic Punishment.
1Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego.
Psychological Science
|April 29, 2022
Summary
Paying people to punish others decreases their willingness to do so. This occurs because payment corrupts the prosocial signal that moralistic punishment normally conveys about a punisher's motives.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Moral Psychology
Background:
- Moralistic punishment, or punishing norm violators, is crucial for social cooperation.
- The motivations behind moralistic punishment are often assumed to be purely prosocial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how financial incentives affect individuals' willingness to engage in moralistic punishment.
- To explore the psychological mechanisms underlying the impact of payment on punishment behavior.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted with 1,495 U.S. adult online participants.
- Utilized economic games with real stakes and judgments of hypothetical transgressions.
- Manipulated monetary bonuses for third-party punishment and perceptions of punishers' character.
Main Results:
- Offering payment for punishment significantly reduced participants' willingness to punish by nearly half.
- Paid punishers were perceived as having worse character and their actions were rated as less morally acceptable.
- Willingness to punish was restored with sufficiently large payments or if payment was framed as still signaling moral virtue.
Conclusions:
- Financial incentives can undermine the prosocial signaling function of moralistic punishment.
- A signal-corruption mechanism explains why payment reduces punishment willingness.
- Understanding sociomoral incentives is key for effective conflict-reduction policies and the cultural evolution of punishment.
Related Concept Videos
Punishment
370
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
370
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
161
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
161
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.8K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.8K
Egoism and Altruism
92.2K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
92.2K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.5K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.5K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
199
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
199

