Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of symphysis-fundal height and ultrasound as screening tests for light-for-gestational age infants

British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|February 1, 1987
PubMed

Insights

Serial symphysis-fundal height (SFH) measurements and single fetal abdominal circumference (AC) ultrasound scans effectively predict light-for-gestational age (LGA) infants. Combining both methods enhances sensitivity for LGA prediction, though specificity decreases.

Area of Science:

  • Perinatology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of light-for-gestational age (LGA) infants is crucial for optimizing perinatal outcomes.
  • Symphysis-fundal height (SFH) measurement is a common clinical method for fetal growth assessment.
  • Ultrasound measurement of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) offers a detailed assessment of fetal size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical efficiency of serial SFH measurements versus a single third-trimester ultrasound AC measurement for predicting LGA infants.
  • To determine the optimal use of SFH and AC measurements, individually and in combination, for LGA screening.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study evaluating serial SFH measurements against a single ultrasound AC measurement in the third trimester.
  • Adjusted the lower cut-off point for AC to match the specificity of SFH for direct comparison.
  • Assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for both methods and their combination.

Main Results:

  • Ultrasound AC measurement showed slightly higher sensitivity (83%) than SFH (76%), a difference not statistically significant.
  • Both methods exhibited a high false positive rate (approximately 60%), similar to clinical assessment.
  • Combining both tests improved sensitivity to 93% but reduced specificity to 67% and positive predictive value to 32%.

Conclusions:

  • Serial SFH measurements and single AC ultrasound are comparable in predicting LGA infants.
  • Using both SFH and AC measurements together significantly increases sensitivity for LGA detection.
  • Recommended using both methods if ultrasound is available; otherwise, SFH screening with ultrasound backup is a viable alternative for LGA prediction.

Related Concept Videos