Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

11:07
Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
Published on: September 5, 2025
321
Retrograde stent with external string for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty: does it reduce cost and complications?
Adam J Rensing1, Benjamin M Whittam2, Konrad M Szymanski2
1Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. Adam-Rensing@ouhsc.edu.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
|April 29, 2022
Summary
Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) with a stent with external string (SWES) reduces costs by 25% in pediatric UPJO treatment. While SWES avoids a second anesthetic, it carries a risk of unplanned returns for procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Health Economics
Background:
- Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is commonly treated in children using robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP).
- Traditionally, ureteral stent removal requires a separate operating room visit and anesthesia.
- Our institution implemented a stent with external string (SWES) approach prior to RAP to streamline care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the operative time, complications, and costs associated with the SWES approach compared to traditional methods.
- To evaluate the impact of SWES on healthcare costs and unplanned hospital returns.
- To assess national trends in postoperative drainage management following pediatric RAP.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective collection of pediatric RAP cases utilizing the SWES approach (Aug 2012-July 2017).
- Comparison of 30-day healthcare costs using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database against a national cohort.
- Anonymous electronic survey to PHIS institutions regarding predominant postoperative drainage techniques.
Main Results:
- The SWES cohort demonstrated significantly lower median 30-day healthcare costs ($10,548) compared to the national RAP cohort ($14,119, p < 0.001).
- The SWES group experienced a 15.5% rate of unplanned hospital returns, with 8.2% requiring a procedure.
- Nationwide survey revealed 84.6% of institutions primarily leave stents without strings post-RAP.
Conclusions:
- The SWES approach for pediatric RAP is associated with substantial cost savings (approx. 25%) and avoids a second anesthetic for stent removal.
- While SWES reduces overall costs, it is linked to an increased risk of unplanned returns for procedures.
- Current national practice predominantly favors leaving ureteral stents without strings after pediatric RAP.

