Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Rates Following Use of Regular Compared With Defective Respirators When Caring for COVID-19
Henrik A Kolstad1,2, Morten Frydenberg1, Kent Jacob Nielsen3
1Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Regular respirators offer significant protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, unlike a defective new brand. This study confirms the protective effect of standard respirators for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Limited evidence exists on respirator effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 in daily work settings.
- Previous studies show strong protection against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV.
- This study addresses the gap in evidence for SARS-CoV-2 protection during routine healthcare activities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the protective efficacy of regular respirators against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- To compare the effectiveness of a standard respirator versus a new, potentially defective brand.
- To evaluate respirator performance in healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study design.
- Involved 463 participants using regular respirators and 168 using a new brand respirator.
- Follow-up occurred from December 2020 to January 2021, tracking daily infections until positive PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2.
Main Results:
- Seven incident SARS-CoV-2 cases in the regular respirator group and eight in the new brand group.
- Daily infection rates were 0.2% for regular respirators and 0.5% for the new brand.
- Incidence rate ratio was 0.4 (95% CI 0.1; 1.0), indicating reduced infection risk with regular respirators.
Conclusions:
- The new brand respirator was considered a sham intervention due to frequent defects.
- This study provides further evidence supporting the protective effect of regular respirators against SARS-CoV-2.
- Standard respirators are crucial for protecting healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 exposure.
Related Concept Videos
Tracheostomy Care II: Procedure
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene, and put on personal protective equipment: gown, gloves, mask...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III

