Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

01:24
Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy
Published on: September 8, 2023
602
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation With Type II Modic Changes
Hai Zhu1, Zakir Hussain2, Meng Zhang1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Huaian First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, China.
World Neurosurgery
|April 30, 2022
Summary
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is effective for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, patients with type II Modic change may experience persistent pain and higher recurrence rates post-PELD.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Minimally invasive procedures
- Degenerative disc disease
Background:
- Lumbar radiculopathy due to intervertebral disc herniation is commonly treated with PELD.
- Type II Modic changes are associated with persistent low back pain and increased LDH recurrence after surgery.
- Evaluating PELD outcomes in LDH patients with type II Modic changes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of PELD in managing lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients with type II Modic changes.
- To compare clinical outcomes and recurrence rates between LDH patients with and without type II Modic changes after PELD.
- To identify potential challenges and suggest management strategies for LDH patients with type II Modic changes undergoing PELD.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 267 single-level LDH patients (aged 20-50) who underwent PELD was analyzed.
- Clinical outcomes including VAS, ODI, and MacNab scores were evaluated pre- and post-surgery up to 48 months.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with and without type II Modic changes was performed.
Main Results:
- PELD significantly improved VAS and ODI scores in all analyzed LDH patients.
- Excellent/good MacNab scores were achieved in 87.0% (non-Modic) and 82.1% (Modic type II) of patients.
- LDH patients with type II Modic changes showed higher VAS/ODI scores and recurrence rates at longer follow-up.
Conclusions:
- PELD is an effective treatment for LDH, but careful consideration is needed for patients with type II Modic changes.
- Continuous low back pain and recurrence risk are elevated in LDH patients with type II Modic changes post-PELD.
- Extended brace support or alternative interventions may benefit LDH patients with type II Modic changes.

