Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

556
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
556
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

491
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
491
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

302
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
302
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

9.5K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
9.5K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

12.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
12.9K
Sampling Theorem01:15

Sampling Theorem

817
In signal processing, the analysis of continuous-time signals, denoted as x(t), often involves sampling techniques to convert these signals into discrete-time signals. This process is essential for digital representation and manipulation. A critical component in sampling is the train of impulses, characterized by the sampling interval and the sampling frequency. The relationship between these parameters and the original signal's properties dictates the success of the sampling process.
817

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SparsePool: A Graph Pooling Framework via Sparse Representation for Graph Classification.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Regenerative potential of immune cells after traumatic muscle injury.

Frontiers in immunology·2025
Same author

Unifying Node Labels, Features, and Distances for Deep Network Completion.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Ricci Curvature-Based Semi-Supervised Learning on an Attributed Network.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Finding overlapping communities in multilayer networks.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Null Model and Community Structure in Multiplex Networks.

Scientific reports·2018
Same journal

DARUMA: a gateway to fast and easy prediction of intrinsically disordered regions.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Alzheimer's disease detection using a quantum deep neural network with Haralick feature extraction and simulated annealing optimization.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Network anomaly detection using Deep Autoencoder and parallel Artificial Bee Colony algorithm-trained neural network.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

An anomaly detection model for multivariate time series with anomaly perception.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Retraction: A wormhole attack detection method for tactical wireless sensor networks.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of mental disorder with prioritization of its type by utilizing the bipolar complex fuzzy decision-making approach based on Schweizer-Sklar prioritized aggregation operators.

PeerJ. Computer science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

607

Evaluating graph neural networks under graph sampling scenarios.

Qiang Wei1,2, Guangmin Hu1

  • 1University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, School of Information and Communication Engineering, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Peerj. Computer Science
|May 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) show robustness on incomplete network structures. Completing sampled subgraphs often enhances performance, but effectiveness varies by dataset, guiding the choice of GNNs for real-world network analysis.

Keywords:
EvaluationGraph neural networkGraph samplingImcomplete structure

More Related Videos

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.2K
Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array
10:32

Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array

Published on: October 20, 2023

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

607
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.2K
Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array
10:32

Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array

Published on: October 20, 2023

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Network Science
  • Machine Learning
  • Graph Theory

Background:

  • Real-world network analysis often deals with incomplete structural data.
  • Existing network analysis methods typically assume complete network structures.
  • Key questions involve method performance on partial networks and the benefit of structure completion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the robustness of graph neural networks (GNNs) on incomplete network structures.
  • To compare the performance of different GNNs and sampling methods.
  • To determine the utility of completing missing network structures for downstream tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Treated incomplete networks as random samples from complete graphs.
  • Systematically evaluated six state-of-the-art GNNs.
  • Utilized four common graph sampling techniques for evaluation.

Main Results:

  • GNNs are applicable to incomplete network structures, with simpler models sometimes outperforming complex ones.
  • Completing sampled subgraphs generally improves downstream task performance.
  • Structure completion effectiveness is dataset-dependent and requires careful evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • GNNs offer a viable approach for analyzing partially observed networks.
  • Network structure completion can be beneficial but is not universally effective.
  • Dataset-specific evaluation is crucial when deciding on structure completion strategies.