Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.5K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.5K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.7K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

283
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
283
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

18.8K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
18.8K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay02:27

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

10.9K
The Upf proteins that carry out nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) are found in all eukaryotic organisms, including humans. Each protein has an individual role, but they need to work in collaboration. Upf1 is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds the RNA helix. Because Upf1 can unwind any RNA, Upf2 and Upf3 are required to help Upf1 discriminate between nonsense and normal mRNAs.
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

circVDJ-seq for T cell clonotype detection in single-cell and spatial multi-omics.

Genome medicine·2026
Same author

HDAC7 controls anti-viral and anti-tumor immunity by CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Non-Temperature-Induced Antitumor Effects of Amplitude-Modulated Radiofrequency: Molecular and Functional Synergies with Radiotherapy.

Cancers·2026
Same author

CRISPR/Cas9 engineered and whole-genome characterized KIT D816V-mutant human iPSC lines.

Stem cell research·2026
Same author

BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> patient derived colon cancer organoids identify biomarkers of response to EGFR and BRAF inhibition and replicate clinical data.

Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR·2026
Same author

The AICL-KLRF1 axis supports CD4-CD8 T cell communication and cytokine competence in pre-exhausted CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells.

EMBO reports·2026
Same journal

Enhancing cereal productivity via nitrogen use efficiency: from conventional breeding to modern genomics.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Transcriptomic analysis reveals FcγR-mediated phagocytosis as a key pathway for the anti-inflammatory action of <i>Polygonatum sibiricum</i> polysaccharides in loach.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

A novel <i>ABO</i> splice site variant underlying the A<sub>3</sub> phenotype: immunogenetic basis and functional dissection.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Case Report: Identification of two novel <i>ALMS1</i> variants in a patient with a ciliopathy resembling Alström syndrome.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Integrative analysis identifies Hspa5 as a key regulator of the ERS/UPR-immune axis in spinal cord injury.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of genomic selection to improve survival of eastern oysters infected with <i>Perkinsus marinus</i>.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

38.6K

Venn Diagrams May Indicate Erroneous Statistical Reasoning in Transcriptomics.

January Weiner1, Benedikt Obermayer1, Dieter Beule1

  • 1Core Unit Bioinformatics, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Frontiers in Genetics
|May 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers found that testing gene expression differences separately in groups is statistically incorrect. The correct method involves testing for treatment-group interactions to avoid misleading results in gene set enrichment analysis.

Keywords:
functional genomicsgene set analysisgene set enrichmenttranscriptomicsvenn diagram

More Related Videos

Sample Preparation and Analysis of RNASeq-based Gene Expression Data from Zebrafish
11:42

Sample Preparation and Analysis of RNASeq-based Gene Expression Data from Zebrafish

Published on: October 27, 2017

11.0K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

38.6K
Sample Preparation and Analysis of RNASeq-based Gene Expression Data from Zebrafish
11:42

Sample Preparation and Analysis of RNASeq-based Gene Expression Data from Zebrafish

Published on: October 27, 2017

11.0K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Differential gene expression analysis is crucial for identifying treatment effects across sample groups.
  • A common but flawed approach involves separate analyses per group, followed by selecting genes significant in only one group.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the statistical incorrectness of separate differential expression analyses across groups.
  • To highlight the potential for misleading artifacts in gene set enrichment analysis when using incorrectly identified group-specific genes.
  • To advocate for testing treatment-group interactions as the statistically sound method.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of differential gene expression data.
  • Comparison of separate group analyses versus interaction term testing.
  • Evaluation of gene set enrichment analysis outcomes on incorrectly defined gene sets.

Main Results:

  • The procedure of separate differential expression testing per group is statistically invalid.
  • Gene set enrichment analysis on incorrectly selected genes can produce artifacts, masking true group-specific effects.
  • A significant portion of published research employs this flawed methodology.

Conclusions:

  • Testing for treatment-group interaction is the correct statistical approach for identifying group-specific gene expression changes.
  • Incorrect methods can lead to erroneous biological interpretations and obscure true treatment effects.
  • Correct statistical practices are essential for reliable bioinformatics research.