Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.4K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.4K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.5K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.9K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

311
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
311
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.9K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.9K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

232
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
232

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Doubly regularized generalized linear models for spatial observations with high-dimensional covariates.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics·2026
Same author

Association of glycemic variability with 28-day mortality and adverse outcomes among non-diabetes patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a retrospective analysis on the MIMIC-IV database.

BMC endocrine disorders·2026
Same author

Intraindividual cognitive variability predicts amyloid beta, tau PET, and dementia conversion in Down syndrome: a potential marker of cognitive resilience.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Building an Interoperable Rare Disease Multi-omic Resource: The GREGoR Data Model and Dataset.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Covariate-Adjusted Inference for Differential Analysis of High-Dimensional Networks.

Sankhya. Series A. (2008)·2026
Same author

Digital Atlases to Unlock the Potential of Brain Biorepository Tissues for Interdisciplinary Research.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Statistical significance in high-dimensional linear mixed models.

Lina Lin1, Mathias Drton2, Ali Shojaie3

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Washington.

FODS '20 : Proceedings of the 2020 ACM-IMS Foundations of Data Science Conference : October 19-20, 2020, Virtual Event, USA. ACM-IMS Foundations of Data Science Conference (2020 : Online)
|May 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for high-dimensional linear mixed effect models, enabling valid statistical inference. The method corrects biased estimators, improving accuracy for complex datasets with many variables.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • High-dimensional linear mixed effect models are crucial for analyzing complex, correlated data, such as repeated measurements from multiple subjects.
  • Existing methods often struggle with large numbers of fixed effects (p) relative to the number of subjects (M), especially when random effects (q) are few.
  • Inference in these models is challenging due to the interplay of fixed and random effects and high dimensionality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel inferential framework for high-dimensional linear mixed effect models.
  • To extend de-biasing techniques for penalized estimators to address the complexities of mixed effect models.
  • To provide asymptotically valid confidence intervals for model parameters in high-dimensional settings.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed framework adapts de-biasing strategies for penalized estimators, building upon existing work for high-dimensional linear models.
  • A 'naive' ridge estimator is corrected to achieve asymptotically valid inference.
  • Theoretical results are supported by numerical experiments and a practical case study.

Main Results:

  • The developed method provides asymptotically valid confidence intervals for parameters in high-dimensional linear mixed effect models.
  • Numerical experiments demonstrate superior performance compared to methods that ignore random effects-induced correlations.
  • The framework's practical utility is shown on a riboflavin production dataset with group structure.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed inferential framework offers a robust solution for high-dimensional linear mixed effect models.
  • Accounting for correlations induced by random effects is critical for accurate inference.
  • The method is applicable to real-world biological and industrial datasets with complex structures.