Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With
Maria Elena Lunati1, Paola Silvia Morpurgo1, Antonio Rossi1
1Endocrinology Division, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Introduction:
Predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems may improve glucose control and quality of life in type 1 diabetic individuals. This is a cross-sectional, single-center study to compare the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of PLGS and HCL systems as compared to standard sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 136 adults (men/women 69/67, mean age 47.3 ± 13.9 years) with T1D on insulin pump therapy, divided accordingly to type of insulin pump system (group 1: SAP, 24 subjects; group 2: PLGS, 49 subjects; group 3: HCL, 63 subjects). The groups were matched for age, gender, years of disease, years of CSII use, and CGM wear time.
Results:
The analysis of CGM metrics, in the three groups, showed a statistically significant different percentage of time within the target range, defined as 70-180 mg/dl, with a higher percentage in group 3 and significantly less time spent in the hypoglycemic range in groups 2 and 3. The three groups were statistically different also for the glucose management indicator and coefficient of variation percentage, which were progressively lower moving from group 1 to group 3. In the HCL group, 52.4% of subjects reached a percentage of time passed in the euglycemic range above 70%, as compared to 32.7% in those with PLGS and 20.2% in those with SAP. A positive correlation between the higher percentage of TIR and the use of auto-mode was evident in the HCL group. Finally, the three groups did not show any statistical differences regarding the quality-of-life questionnaire, but there was a significant negative correlation between CV and perceived CSII-use convenience (r = -0.207, p = 0.043).
Conclusion:
HCL systems were more effective in improving glucose control and in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes, thereby mitigating risk for acute and chronic complications and positively affecting diabetes technologies' acceptance.
More Related Videos
08:32Studying the Hypothalamic Insulin Signal to Peripheral Glucose Intolerance with a Continuous Drug Infusion System into the Mouse Brain
Published on: January 4, 2018
07:35Author Spotlight: Investigating the Blood Glucose Homeostasis in Murine Brain Using a Cost-Effective Hyperglycemic And Hypoglycemic Clamp Technique
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Glucose Homeostasis: Pancreatic Islets and Insulin Secretion
Insulin and C-peptide are...