External validation of prognostic models predicting outcome after chronic subdural hematoma

Dana C Holl1,2,3, Ana Mikolic4, Jurre Blaauw5

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus MC Stroke Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. d.holl@erasmusmc.nl.

Insights

Existing prediction models for chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) outcomes show poor performance. Further research is needed to develop reliable prognostic tools for CSH patients.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Several prognostic models for chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) treatment outcomes exist.
  • These models lack sufficient external validation for routine clinical use.
  • Accurate outcome prediction in CSH patients remains a clinical challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of existing prognostic models for predicting outcomes in patients with CSH.
  • To evaluate the calibration and discrimination of validated models using a large retrospective database.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search up to February 2021 for CSH prognostic models.
  • External validation of identified models using a retrospective database of 2384 patients.
  • Assessment of model calibration and discrimination (concordance index C).

Main Results:

  • Three models were externally validated: one for 30-day mortality and two for hematoma recurrence.
  • Models overestimated outcomes (e.g., 11% overestimation for mortality).
  • Discriminative ability was poor to modest (C-indices ranging from 0.46 to 0.70).

Conclusions:

  • Existing prognostic models demonstrate inadequate predictive performance for CSH outcomes.
  • The heterogeneity of CSH patients contributes to prediction difficulties.
  • Development of high-quality prognostic models with unified predictors and outcomes is warranted.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos