Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vascularisation in 3D bioprinted models: emerging solutions engineering functional tissues and tumour models.

Biofabrication·2025
Same author

Plasticity of Expression of Stem Cell and EMT Markers in Breast Cancer Cells in 2D and 3D Culture Depend on the Spatial Parameters of Cell Growth; Mathematical Modeling of Mechanical Stress in Cell Culture in Relation to ECM Stiffness.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

3D modeling of normal skin and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. A comparative study in 2D cultures, spheroids, and 3D bioprinted systems.

Biofabrication·2024
Same author

Calcination and ion substitution improve physicochemical and biological properties of nanohydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering applications.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Effects of Sterilization and Hydrolytic Degradation on the Structure, Morphology and Compressive Strength of Polylactide-Hydroxyapatite Composites.

International journal of molecular sciences·2022
Same author

Inhibition of LPAR6 overcomes sorafenib resistance by switching glycolysis into oxidative phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Biochimie·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Preparation of 3D Fibrin Scaffolds for Stem Cell Culture Applications
07:04

Preparation of 3D Fibrin Scaffolds for Stem Cell Culture Applications

Published on: March 2, 2012

25.5K

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Seeding on 3D Scaffolds.

Agata Kurzyk1

  • 1Department of Cancer Biology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. agata.kurzyk@pib-nio.pl.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|May 4, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating mesenchymal stem cell seeding in 3D scaffolds is crucial for regenerative medicine. This study reviews key assays like MTS, MTT, and ATP to assess cell viability, adhesion, and proliferation on scaffolds, aiding tissue engineering product development.

Keywords:
3D cultureATPAlamar BlueCell seedingEfficiencyEvaluationMTSMTTPicoGreenScaffolds

More Related Videos

3D Magnetic Stem Cell Aggregation and Bioreactor Maturation for Cartilage Regeneration
09:46

3D Magnetic Stem Cell Aggregation and Bioreactor Maturation for Cartilage Regeneration

Published on: April 27, 2017

9.9K
Optimizing Attachment of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Poly(ε-caprolactone) Electrospun Yarns
10:50

Optimizing Attachment of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Poly(ε-caprolactone) Electrospun Yarns

Published on: April 10, 2015

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Preparation of 3D Fibrin Scaffolds for Stem Cell Culture Applications
07:04

Preparation of 3D Fibrin Scaffolds for Stem Cell Culture Applications

Published on: March 2, 2012

25.5K
3D Magnetic Stem Cell Aggregation and Bioreactor Maturation for Cartilage Regeneration
09:46

3D Magnetic Stem Cell Aggregation and Bioreactor Maturation for Cartilage Regeneration

Published on: April 27, 2017

9.9K
Optimizing Attachment of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Poly(ε-caprolactone) Electrospun Yarns
10:50

Optimizing Attachment of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Poly(ε-caprolactone) Electrospun Yarns

Published on: April 10, 2015

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) seeding efficiency in 3D scaffolds is critical for successful tissue engineering.
  • Accurate quantification of seeded cells, their viability, and adhesion is essential for developing effective regenerative medicine products.
  • Current methods often rely on indirect measurements of cellular activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a selection of assays for evaluating MSC seeding efficiency in 3D scaffolds.
  • To highlight the importance of choosing appropriate methods for assessing cell-scaffold constructs.
  • To discuss the challenges in developing standardized assessment methods for tissue engineering.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common cellular assays including MTS, MTT, ATP, DAPI, Alamar Blue, and Pico Green dsDNA.
  • These assays measure parameters such as cell viability, membrane integrity, metabolic activity, proliferation, and DNA/protein content.
  • Focus on assays applicable to cell seeding evaluation in 3D scaffold environments.

Main Results:

  • The reviewed assays provide diverse methods to quantify viable cells and assess their condition on scaffolds.
  • Assays can determine cell number, metabolic activity, proliferation rates, and DNA/protein content within cell-scaffold constructs.
  • Each assay offers specific insights into cell behavior and seeding efficiency.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of appropriate assays is paramount for accurately evaluating MSC seeding efficiency in 3D scaffolds.
  • Standardization of assessment methods for cell-scaffold constructs remains a significant challenge in tissue engineering.
  • Reliable evaluation of cell seeding is fundamental for advancing regenerative medicine applications.