Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
First-Line Catheter Ablation of Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Cardiomyopathy Concurrent With Defibrillator
Roderick Tung1,2,3, Yumei Xue2, Minglong Chen4
1The University of Chicago, Center for Arrhythmia Care, Pritzker School of Medicine, IL (R.T., D.Y.S., S.A.B.).
Insights
Early catheter ablation alongside implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation significantly lowers ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence and ICD therapies in patients with cardiomyopathy. This approach reduces adverse events compared to conventional therapy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation is not standard practice.
- There's a need to evaluate VT ablation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients receiving advanced therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the role of early, first-line catheter ablation in patients with cardiomyopathy undergoing ICD implantation.
- To compare outcomes of ablation plus ICD versus conventional therapy plus ICD.
Main Methods:
- International, multicenter randomized controlled trial with 121 patients (ablation + ICD vs. conventional therapy + ICD).
- A separate registry followed 47 patients who received stand-alone ablation.
- Primary outcome: VT recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, or death.
Main Results:
- The ablation group showed a 42% reduction in the primary outcome (HR 0.58, P=0.04) driven by decreased VT recurrence (HR 0.51, P=0.02).
- ICD therapies (shocks and pacing) were significantly lower in the ablation group (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively).
- No significant difference in cardiovascular hospitalization or mortality; ablation complications occurred in 8.3%.
Conclusions:
- Early catheter ablation at ICD implantation reduces VT recurrence and ICD therapies in cardiomyopathy patients.
- This strategy improves outcomes by decreasing VT burden and associated interventions.
Background:
Catheter ablation as first-line therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) at the time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has not been adopted into clinical guidelines. Also, there is an unmet clinical need to prospectively examine the role of VT ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, an increasingly prevalent population that is referred for advanced therapies globally.
Methods:
We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolling 180 patients with cardiomyopathy and monomorphic VT with an indication for ICD implantation to assess the role of early, first-line ablation therapy. A total of 121 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to ablation plus an ICD versus conventional medical therapy plus an ICD. Patients who refused ICD (n=47) were followed in a prospective registry after stand-alone ablation treatment. The primary outcome was a composite end point of VT recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, or death.
Results:
Randomly assigned patients had a mean age of 55 years (interquartile range, 46-64) and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% (interquartile range, 30%-49%); 81% were male. The underlying heart disease was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 35%, nonischemic cardiomyopathy in 30%, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in 35%. Ablation was performed a median of 2 days before ICD implantation (interquartile range, 5 days before to 14 days after). At 31 months, the primary outcome occurred in 49.3% of the ablation group and 65.5% in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.35-0.96]; P=0.04). The observed difference was driven by a reduction in VT recurrence in the ablation arm (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95%CI, 0.29-0.90]; P=0.02). A statistically significant reduction in both ICD shocks (10.0% versus 24.6%; P=0.03) and antitachycardia pacing (16.2% versus 32.8%; P=0.04) was observed in patients who underwent ablation compared with control. No differences in cardiovascular hospitalization (32.0% versus. 33.7%; hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.43-1.56]; P=0.55) or mortality (8.9% versus 8.8%; hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.38-5.22]; P=0.62]) were observed. Ablation-related complications occurred in 8.3% of patients.
Conclusions:
Among patients with cardiomyopathy of varied causes, early catheter ablation performed at the time of ICD implantation significantly reduced the composite primary outcome of VT recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization, or death. These findings were driven by a reduction in ICD therapies.
Registration:
URL: https://www.
Clinicaltrials:
gov; Unique identifier: NCT02848781.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias