Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Management strategies for implementing a multicenter cross-sectional study: lessons from the ADHERE Brazil study
Elisa Oliveira Marsicano-Souza1, Fernando Antônio Basile Colugnati2, Barbara Bruna Abreu de Castro3
1RN, PhD. Professor, Renal Transplantation Unit, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil; and Researcher, Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Estudos, Pesquisas e Tratamento em Nefrologia (NIEPEN), Juiz de Fora (MG), Brazil.
Background:
Epidemiological studies involving large samples usually face financial and operational challenges.
Objectives:
To describe the planning and execution of ADHERE Brazil, an epidemiological study on 1,105 kidney transplant patients, and report on how the study was structured, difficulties faced and solutions found.
Design And Setting:
Cross-sectional multicenter study in 20 Brazilian kidney transplantation centers.
Methods:
Actions developed in each phase of implementation were described, with emphasis on innovations used within the logistics of this study, aimed at estimating the prevalence of nonadherence to treatment.
Results:
Coordination of activities was divided into four areas: general, regulatory, data collection and statistics. Weekly meetings were held for action planning. The general coordination team was in charge of project elaboration, choice of participating centers, definition of publication policy and monitoring other coordination teams. The regulatory team provided support to centers for submitting the project to ethics committees. The data collection team prepared a manual on the electronic collection system, scheduled web meetings and was available to respond to queries. It also monitored the data quality and reported any inadequacies found. Communication with the centers was through monthly reports via e-mail and distribution of exclusive material. The statistical team acted in all phases of the study, especially in creating the data analysis plan and data bank, generation of randomization lists and data extraction.
Conclusions:
Through these logistics, we collected high-quality data and built a local research infrastructure for further studies. We present supporting alternatives for conducting similar studies.
Clinical Trial Annotation:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ on October 10, 2013; NCT02066935.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Longitudinal Research
Cross-Sectional Research
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Longitudinal Studies