Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
Surveying practicing firearm examiners
Nicholas Scurich1, Brandon L Garrett2, Robert M Thompson3
1University of California, Irvine, USA.
Abstract:
A sample (n = 79) of practicing firearm and toolmark examiners was queried about casework as well as their views about the potential role that statistics might play in future firearm examinations and expert witness testimony. Principal findings include: The modal response for time spent conducting bullet examinations is 2-4 hours, and the modal response for cartridge casings is 1-2 hours. The average participant (median) makes an identification in 65% of casework, makes an elimination in 12% of casework, and reports that the examination was inconclusive in 20% of casework calls. The vast majority of examiners work at laboratories that permit eliminations when class characteristics agree. The reported industry-wide false positive error rate is 1%, though very few participants could name a study or give a citation for their reported estimate. Qualitative responses about the potential role of statistics were mixed.
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Introduction to Surveying, Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveys
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

